Disability disparities in STEM: Gaps in salaries and representation for doctorate recipients with disabilities in the U.S., 2019
Castro, F.; Stuart, E.; Deal, J.; Varadaraj, V.; Swenor, B. K.
Show abstract
IntroductionThere is paucity of data examining disparities in salary and representation for disabled scientists, which is needed to advance inclusion and equity for people with disabilities in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM). MethodsAnalyses used cross-sectional data from the 2019 Survey of Doctorate Recipients. We compared salaries between doctorate recipients with and without disabilities who were currently employed in STEM (N = 704,013), but who were otherwise similar on socioeconomic, degree and job-related characteristics, using propensity score weighting to carry out balanced comparisons, and further examined these differences in salary in the subset of doctorate recipients working in STEM at academic institutions (N = 219,413). In the subset of participants working in academia, we examined whether the representation of people with disabilities differed across categories of academic career milestones using chi-square tests ( = 0.05). ResultsDoctorate recipients working in STEM with early onset disabilities (identified <25 years of age) earned $10,580 less per year than non-disabled workers, and in the subset of academic workers this difference was larger (-$14,360). Salaries appeared lower for people with late onset disabilities as compared to those without, although these differences did not reach statistical significance. We observed an underrepresentation of academics with disabilities at higher faculty ranks (p<0.0001), among Deans/Presidents (p<0.0001) and among those with tenure (p: 0.0004). ConclusionThese findings support a need to expand efforts to foster inclusion, provide equal opportunities for career advancement, and improve working conditions for people with disabilities in STEM.
Matching journals
The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Citizenship status and career self-efficacy: An intersectional study of biomedical trainees in the United States 92%
- Rationale and design of the Health Professional Students at the University of Illinois Chicago (HOLISTIC) Cohort Study 92%
- Assessment of Sociodemographic Factors Associated with Time to Self-reported COVID-19 Infection Among a Large Multi-Center Prospective Cohort Population in the Southeastern United States 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Racial/Ethnic Disparities in the Observed COVID-19 Case Fatality Rate Among the U.S. Population 91%
- Deprivation and Segregation in Ovarian cancer survival among African American Women: a mediated analysis 89%
- COVID-19 Mortality in California Based on Death Certificates: Disproportionate Impacts Across Racial/Ethnic Groups and Nativity 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Lifecourse Socioeconomic Status and Cognitive Performance Among Midlife Latina Women in a California Agricultural Region 90%
- Risk of COVID-19 Reinfection and Vaccine Breakthrough Infection, Madera County, California, 2021 90%
- The US Midlife Mortality Crisis Continues: Excess Cause-Specific Mortality During 2020 90%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy January-March 2021 among 18-64 year old US adults by employment and occupation 90%
- Characteristics associated with COVID-19 vaccination status among staff and faculty of a large, diverse University in Los Angeles 90%
- COVID-19 booster vaccine attitudes and behaviors among university students and staff: the USC Trojan Pandemic Research Initiative 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.