Back

Enhanced Protection from SARS-CoV-2 Variants by MVA-Based Vaccines Expressing Matched or Mismatched S Proteins Administered Intranasally to hACE2 Mice

Cotter, C. A.; Americo, J. L.; Earl, P. L.; Moss, B.

2022-12-05 microbiology
10.1101/2022.12.03.518963 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The continuous evolution of SARS-CoV-2 strains is contributing to the prolongation of the global pandemic. We previously reported the prevention or more rapid clearance of SARS-CoV-2 from the nasal turbinates and lungs of susceptible K18-hACE2 mice that had been vaccinated intranasally (IN) rather than intramuscularly (IM) with a recombinant MVA (rMVA) expressing a modified S protein of the ancestor SARS-CoV-2 strain. Here, we constructed additional rMVAs and pseudoviruses expressing modified S protein of SARS-CoV-2 variants and compared the ability of vaccines with S proteins that were matched or mismatched to neutralize variants, bind to S proteins and protect K18-hACE2 mice against SARS-CoV-2 challenge. Although vaccines with matched S proteins induced higher neutralizing antibodies, vaccines with mismatched S proteins still protected against severe disease and reduced virus and mRNAs in the lungs and nasal turbinates, though not as well as vaccines with matched S proteins. In mice earlier primed and boosted with rMVA expressing ancestral S, antibodies to the latter increased after one immunization with rMVA expressing Omicron S, but neutralizing antibody to Omicron required a second immunization. Passive transfer of Wuhan immune serum with Omicron S binding but undetectable neutralizing activities reduced infection of the lungs by the variant. Notably, the reduction in infection of the nasal turbinates and lungs was significantly greater when the rMVAs were administered IN rather than IM and this held true for vaccines that were matched or mismatched to the challenge SARS-CoV-2.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.