Back

Spatial single-cell mass spectrometry defines zonation of the hepatocyte proteome

Rosenberger, F. A.; Thielert, M. A.; Strauss, M. T.; Ammar, C.; Maedler, S. C.; Schweizer, L.; Metousis, A.; Skowronek, P.; Wahle, M.; Schniering, J.; Semenova, A.; Schiller, H. B.; Rodriguez, E.; Nordmann, T. M.; Mund, A.; Mann, M.

2022-12-03 systems biology
10.1101/2022.12.03.518957 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Single-cell proteomics by mass spectrometry (MS) is emerging as a powerful and unbiased method for the characterization of biological heterogeneity. So far, it has been limited to cultured cells, whereas an expansion of the method to complex tissues would greatly enhance biological insights. Here we describe single-cell Deep Visual Proteomics (scDVP), a technology that integrates high-content imaging, laser microdissection and multiplexed MS. scDVP resolves the context-dependent, spatial proteome of murine hepatocytes at a current depth of 1,700 proteins from a slice of a cell. Half of the proteome was differentially regulated in a spatial manner, with protein levels changing dramatically in proximity to the central vein. We applied machine learning to proteome classes and images, which subsequently inferred the spatial proteome from imaging data alone. scDVP is applicable to healthy and diseased tissues and complements other spatial proteomics or spatial omics technologies.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
○ 5641 papers in training set
Top 4%
27.1%
Similar papers in this journal
2
Cell Systems
○ 201 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.1%
Similar papers in this journal
3
Molecular Systems Biology
○ 162 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.9%
Similar papers in this journal
50% of probability mass above
4
Nature Methods
○ 385 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.9%
Similar papers in this journal
5
Cell
○ 431 papers in training set
Top 1%
5.6%
Similar papers in this journal
6
Nature Biotechnology
○ 172 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.4%
7
Nature Metabolism
○ 69 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.4%
8
Nature Immunology
○ 79 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
2.7%
9
Cell Reports Methods
○ 165 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.4%
10
Molecular Cell
○ 350 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.2%
11
Nature
○ 645 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.7%
12
Cell Reports
○ 1498 papers in training set
Top 22%
1.1%
13
Science Advances
● 1243 papers in training set
Top 24%
1.1%
14
iScience
○ 1154 papers in training set
Top 25%
1.1%
15
Nature Aging
○ 60 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
16
Science
● 477 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.1%
17
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
● 2444 papers in training set
Top 37%
1.1%
18
eLife
● 5828 papers in training set
Top 69%
0.6%

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.