Alpha suppression during prehension indicates neural motor drive inhibition
Ortiz, O.; Kuruganti, U.; Chester, V.; Wilson, A.; Blustein, D.
Show abstract
Changes in alpha band activity (8-12 Hz) have been shown to indicate the inhibition of engagement of brain regions during cognitive tasks, reflecting real-time cognitive load. Despite this, its feasibility to be used in a more dynamic environment with ongoing motor corrections has not been studied. This research used electroencephalography (EEG) to explore how different brain regions are engaged during a simple grasp and lift task where unexpected changes to the objects properties are introduced. To our knowledge, this is the first study to show alpha activity changes related to motor error correction occur only in motor-related areas (i.e. central areas), but not in error processing areas (ie. fronto-parietal network). This suggests that oscillations over motor areas could reflect inhibition of motor drive related to motor error correction, thus being a potential cortical electrophysiological biomarker for the process, and not solely as a proxy for cognitive demands. This observation is particularly relevant in scenarios where these signals are used to evaluate high cognitive demands co-occurring with high levels of motor errors and corrections, such as prosthesis use. The establishment of electrophysiological biomarkers of mental resource allocation during movement and cognition can help identify indicators of mental workload and motor drive, which may be useful for improving brain-machine interfaces. New and NoteworthyThis research expands on previous fMRI literature by demonstrating that alpha band suppression, an EEG metric with high temporal resolution, occurs over the primary sensorimotor area during error correction of hand movements. This furthers our understanding of alpha suppression beyond processes related to cognitive demands by highlighting how motor control also influences this frequency band. Recognizing that alpha band activity is modulated by both motor and cognitive processes is important in situations where high cognitive demands can lead to a high level of movement errors. Interpretations of such modulation are often attributed only to cognitive demands, whereas a motor process may also play a factor. Furthermore, alpha suppression could be used as a biomarker for error correction with applications in human machine interfaces, such as neuroprostheses.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Effects of TMS over the anterior intraparietal area on anticipatory fingertip force scaling and the size-weight illusion 97%
- Engagement of the contralateral limb can enhance the facilitation of motor output by loud acoustic stimuli 96%
- Changes in Muscle Synergy Structure and Activation Patterns Underlie Force Field Adaptation, Retention, and Generalization 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Mobile EEG reveals functionally dissociable dynamic processes supporting real-world ambulatory obstacle avoidance: Evidence for early proactive control 96%
- Human Brain Dynamics Dissociate Early Perceptual and Late Motor-Related Stages of Affordance Processing 96%
- Alteration of brain dynamics during natural dual-task walking 96%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Sensorimotor expectations bias motor resonance during observation of object lifting: The causal role of pSTS 96%
- The volitional control of individual motor units is constrained within low-dimensional neural manifolds by common inputs 94%
- Projection of Cortical Beta Band Oscillations to a Motor Neuron Pool Across the Full Range of Recruitment 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.