Back

Chloroplast DNA methylation in the kelp Saccharina latissima is determined by origin and influenced by cultivation

Scheschonk, L.; Nielsen, A. M.; Bischof, K.; Jueterbock, A. O.

2022-12-03 genomics
10.1101/2022.12.02.518695 bioRxiv
Show abstract

DNA cytosine methylation is an important epigenetic mechanism in genomic DNA, but absent in the chloroplast DNA of most land plants. We detected methylation in the chloroplast DNA of the kelp Saccharina latissima, a non-model macroalgal species of high ecological (wild populations) and economic importance. Since the functional role of the chloroplast methylome is yet largely unknown, we compared for the first time the chloroplast DNA cytosine methylation between wild and cultured kelp from different climatic origins (High- Arctic (79 {degrees}N) and temperate (54 {degrees}N), laboratory samples at 5 {degrees}C, 10 {degrees}C and 15 {degrees}C). Our results suggest genome-wide differences in methylated sites, and methylation level, between the origins, and a strong effect of cultivation. Functions related to photosynthesis showed differential methylation only between origins. Significant differences in methylation between cultivated and wild samples of genes related to transcription and translation were unique to the high-arctic samples. Both findings indicate that origin and cultivation strongly, but differently affect the chloroplast methylome. Similar methylomes for samples from the same origin - independent from whether they grow in the wild or in the lab - suggest that origin- specific methylation marks on the chloroplast genome are inherited. Given that DNA- methylation affects gene expression, our study suggests that lab-cultivation alters epigenetically determined kelp chloroplast characteristics at least to the same degree as ecotypic differentiation does, but likely on a much shorter timescale. This indicates the capacity for rapid non-genetic adaptation in the kelp Saccharina latissima.

Matching journals

The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.