Back

Danger changes the way the brain consolidates neutral information; and does so by interacting with processes involved in the encoding of that information.

Qureshi, O. A.; Leake, J.; Delaney, A. J.; Killcross, S.; Westbrook, R. F.; Holmes, N. M.

2022-12-03 animal behavior and cognition
10.1101/2022.12.02.518124 bioRxiv
Show abstract

This study examined the effect of danger on consolidation of neutral information in two regions of the rat (male and female) medial temporal lobe: the perirhinal cortex (PRh) and basolateral amygdala complex (BLA). The neutral information was the association that forms between an auditory stimulus and a visual stimulus (labelled S2 and S1) across their pairings in sensory preconditioning. We show that, when the sensory preconditioning session is followed by a shocked context exposure, the danger shifts consolidation of the S2-S1 association from the PRh to the BLA; and does so by interacting with processes involved in encoding of the S2-S1 pairings. Specifically, we show that the initial S2-S1 pairing in sensory preconditioning is encoded in the BLA and not the PRh; whereas the later S2-S1 pairings are encoded in the PRh and not the BLA. When the sensory preconditioning session is followed by a context alone exposure, the BLA-dependent trace of the early S2-S1 pairings decays and the PRh-dependent trace of the later S2-S1 pairings is consolidated in memory. However, when the sensory preconditioning session is followed by a shocked context exposure, the PRh-dependent trace of the later S2-S1 pairings is suppressed and the BLA-dependent trace of the initial S2-S1 pairing is consolidated in memory. These findings are discussed with respect to mutually inhibitory interactions between the PRh and BLA, and the way that these regions support memory in other protocols, including recognition memory in people. Significance StatementThe perirhinal cortex (PRh) and basolateral amygdala complex (BLA) process the pairings of neutral auditory and visual stimuli in sensory preconditioning. The involvement of each region in this processing is determined by the novelty/familiarity of the stimuli as well as events that occur immediately after the preconditioning session. Novel stimuli are represented in the BLA; however, as these stimuli are repeatedly presented without consequence, they come to be represented in the PRh. Whether the BLA- or PRh-dependent representation is consolidated in memory depends on what happens next. When nothing of significance occurs, the PRh-dependent representation is consolidated and the BLA-dependent representation decays; but when danger is encountered, the PRh-dependent representation is inhibited and the BLA-dependent representation is selected for consolidation.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Neurobiology of Learning and Memory
40 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
38.2%
2
The Journal of Neuroscience
1025 papers in training set
Top 2%
10.7%
3
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 14%
7.6%
50% of probability mass above
4
Learning & Memory
23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.3%
5
Behavioural Brain Research
77 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.2%
6
Behavioral Neuroscience
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
7
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 41%
2.6%
8
Hippocampus
56 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.3%
9
Neuropsychopharmacology
153 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.0%
10
Psychopharmacology
69 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.8%
11
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
49 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.6%
12
eneuro
439 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.6%
13
Neurobiology of Stress
43 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
14
European Journal of Neuroscience
189 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
15
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.4%
16
Neuroscience
97 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
17
Neurobiology of Aging
107 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
18
Current Biology
665 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.8%
19
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 61%
0.6%
20
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 46%
0.6%
21
Brain Sciences
55 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
22
Neuropharmacology
68 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%