Evaluating the use of social contact data to produce age-specific forecasts of SARS-CoV-2 incidence
Munday, J. D.; Abbott, S.; Meakin, S.; Funk, S.
Show abstract
Short-term forecasts can provide predictions of how an epidemic will change in the near future and form a central part of outbreak mitigation and control. Renewal-equation based models are increasingly popular. They infer key epidemiological parameters from historical epidemiological data and forecast future epidemic dynamics without requiring complex mechanistic assumptions. However, these models typically ignore interaction between age-groups, partly due to challenges in parameterising a time varying interaction matrix. Social contact data collected regularly by the CoMix survey during the COVID-19 epidemic in England, provide a means to inform interaction between age-groups in real-time. We developed an age-specific forecasting framework and applied it to two age-stratified time-series: incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection, estimated from a national infection and antibody prevalence survey; and, reported cases according to the UK national COVID-19 dashboard. Jointly fitting our model to social contact data from the CoMix study, we inferred a time-varying next generation matrix which we used to project infections and cases in the four weeks following each of 29 forecast dates between October 2021 and November 2022. We evaluated the forecasts using proper scoring rules and compared performance with three other models with alternative data and specifications alongside two naive baseline models. Overall, incorporating age-interaction improved forecasts of infections and the CoMix-data-informed model was the best performing model at time horizons between two and four weeks. However, this was not true when forecasting cases. We found that age-group-interaction was most important for predicting cases in children and older adults. The contact-data-informed models performed best during the winter months of 2020 - 2021, but performed comparatively poorly in other periods. We highlight challenges regarding the incorporation of contact data in forecasting and offer proposals as to how to extend and adapt our approach, which may lead to more successful forecasts in future.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Assessing the effects of non-pharmaceutical interventions on SARS-CoV-2 transmission in Belgium by means of an extended SEIQRD model and public mobility data 96%
- The COVID-19 vaccination campaign in Switzerland and its impact on disease spread 96%
- Mathematical modeling of COVID-19 in British Columbia: an age-structured model with time-dependent contact rates 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Near-term forecasting of Covid-19 cases and hospitalisations in Aotearoa New Zealand 98%
- Using real-time data to guide decision-making during an influenza pandemic: a modelling analysis 96%
- Predictions of COVID-19 dynamics in the UK: short-term forecasting and analysis of potential exit strategies 96%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Global predictions of short- to medium-term COVID-19 transmission trends : a retrospective assessment 95%
- Sorting out assortativity: when can we assess the contributions of different population groups to epidemic transmission? 95%
- Modeling non-pharmaceutical interventions in the COVID-19 pandemic with survey-based simulations 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Isolation thresholds for curbing SARS-CoV-2 resurgence 94%
- Estimating lengths-of-stay of hospitalized COVID-19 patients using a non-parametric model: a case study in Galicia (Spain) 93%
- Network analysis of England’s single parent household COVID-19 control policy impact: a proof-of-concept study 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.