Back

A generalized adaptive harvesting model exhibits cusp bifurcation, noise, and rate-associated tipping pathways

Tekwa, E. W.; Junquera, V.

2022-12-02 ecology
10.1101/2022.12.01.518756 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The sustainability of renewable resource harvesting may be threatened by environmental and socioeconomic changes that induce tipping points. Here, we propose a synthetic harvesting model with a comprehensive set of socioecological factors that have not been explored together, including market price and stock value, effort and processing costs, labour and natural capital elasticities, societal risk aversion, maximum sustainable yield (MSY), and population growth shape. We solve for harvest rate and stock biomass solutions by applying a timescale-separation between fast ecological dynamics and slow institutional adaptation that responds myopically to short-term net profit. The result is a cusp bifurcation with two composite bifurcation parameters: 1. consumptive scarcity{lambda} c or the ratio of market price-to-processing cost divided by MSY (leading to a pitchfork), and 2. non-consumptive scarcity{lambda} n or the stock value minus a scaled effort cost (leading to saddle-nodes or folds). Together, consumptive and non-consumptive scarcities create a cusp catastrophe. We further identify four tipping phenomena: 1. process (harvest rate) noise-induced tipping; 2. exogenous ({lambda}c) rate+process noise-induced tipping; 3. exogenous noise-induced reduction in tipping; and 4. exogenous cycle-induced reduction in tipping. Case 2 represents the first mechanistically motivated example of rate-associated tipping in socioecological systems, while cases 3 and 4 resemble noise-induced stability. We discuss the empirical relevance of catastrophe and tipping in natural resource management. Our work shows that human institutional behaviour coupled with changing socioecological conditions can cause counterintuitive sustainability and resilience outcomes.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Theoretical Ecology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.2%
2
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
7.1%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 26%
6.8%
4
Ecological Modelling
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
5
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
84 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.3%
6
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 6%
6.3%
7
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.8%
8
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
9
Journal of Theoretical Biology
144 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.8%
10
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 32%
3.9%
11
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 20%
3.6%
12
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.3%
13
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.1%
14
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.9%
15
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 40%
1.8%
16
Oikos
74 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
17
Mathematical Biosciences
42 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.8%
18
Ecology Letters
121 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.8%
19
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
20
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
21
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
53 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
22
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
23
Physical Review E
95 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
24
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
25
Evolutionary Ecology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%