Back

Flexible hidden Markov models for behaviour-dependent habitat selection

Klappstein, N. J.; Thomas, L.; Michelot, T.

2022-12-02 ecology
10.1101/2022.11.30.518554 bioRxiv
Show abstract

There is strong incentive to model behaviour-dependent habitat selection, as this can help delineate critical habitats for important life processes and reduce bias in model parameters. For this purpose, a two-stage modelling approach is often taken: (i) classify behaviours with a hidden Markov model (HMM), and (ii) fit a step selection function (SSF) to each subset of data. However, this approach does not properly account for the uncertainty in behavioural classification, nor does it allow states to depend on habitat selection. An alternative approach is to estimate both state switching and habitat selection in a single, integrated model called an HMM-SSF. We build on this recent methodological work to make the HMM-SSF approach more efficient and general. We focus on writing the model as an HMM where the observation process is defined by an SSF, such that well-known inferential methods for HMMs can be used directly for parameter estimation and state classification. We extend the model to include covariates on the HMM transition probabilities, allowing for inferences into the temporal and individual-specific drivers of state switching. We demonstrate the method through an illustrative example of African zebra (Equus quagga), including state estimation, and simulations to estimate a utilisation distribution. In the zebra analysis, we identified two behavioural states, with clearly distinct patterns of movement and habitat selection ("encamped" and "exploratory"). In particular, although the zebra tended to prefer areas higher in grassland across both behavioural states, this selection was much stronger in the fast, directed exploratory state. We also found a clear diel cycle in behaviour, which indicated that zebras were more likely to be exploring in the morning and encamped in the evening. This method can be used to analyse behaviour-specific habitat selection in a wide range of species and systems. A large suite of statistical extensions and tools developed for HMMs and SSFs can be applied directly to this integrated model, making it a very versatile framework to jointly learn about animal behaviour, habitat selection, and space use.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Movement Ecology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
28.6%
2
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.3%
50% of probability mass above
3
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 6%
5.0%
4
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
5.0%
5
Ecology Letters
121 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.5%
6
Ecography
50 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.7%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.8%
8
Journal of Animal Ecology
63 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.8%
9
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.8%
10
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
11
Ecology
70 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.8%
12
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
13
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
14
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.4%
15
Journal of Theoretical Biology
144 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
16
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
17
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 52%
0.9%
18
Ecological Informatics
29 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
19
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
20
Ecosphere
53 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
21
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
22
Landscape Ecology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%
23
Ecological Modelling
24 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.5%
24
Epidemics
104 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
25
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.5%
26
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 31%
0.5%