Epidemiological impact of a large number of incorrect negative SARS-CoV-2 test results in South West England during September and October 2021
Hounsome, L.; Herr, D.; Bryant, R.; Smith, R.; Loman, L.; Harris, J.; Youhan, U.; Dzene, E.; Hadjipantelis, P.; Long, H.; Laurence, T.; Riley, S.; Cumming, F.
Show abstract
BackgroundIn England, free testing for COVID-19 was widely available from early in the pandemic until 1 April 2022. Based on apparent differences in the rate of positive PCR tests at a single laboratory compared to the rest of the laboratory network, we hypothesised that a substantial number of UK PCR tests processed during September and October 2021 may have been incorrectly reported as negative, compared with the rest of the laboratory network. We investigate the epidemiological impact of this incident. MethodsWe estimate the additional number of COVID-19 cases that would have been reported had the sensitivity of the laboratory test procedure not dropped for the period 2 September to 12 October. In addition, by making comparisons between the most affected local areas and comparator populations, we estimate the number of additional infections, cases, hospitalisations and deaths that could have occurred as a result of increased transmission due to the misclassification of tests. ResultsWe estimate that around 39,000 tests may have been incorrectly classified during this period and, as a direct result of this incident, the most affected areas in the South West could have experienced between 6,000 and 34,000 additional reportable cases, with a central estimate of around 24,000 additional reportable cases. Using modelled relationships between key variables, we estimate that this central estimate could have translated to approximately 55,000 additional infections, which means that each incorrect negative test likely led to just over two additional infections. In those same geographical areas, our results also suggest an increased number of admissions and deaths. ConclusionThe incident is likely to have had a measurable impact on cases and infections in the affected areas in the South West of England.
Matching journals
The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Modelling pooling strategies for SARS-CoV-2 testing in a university setting 92%
- Impact of baseline cases of cough and fever on UK COVID-19 diagnostic testing rates: estimates from the Bug Watch community cohort study 91%
- Investigating the feasibility and potential of combining industry AMR monitoring systems: a comparison with WHO GLASS 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Association of close-range contact patterns with SARS-CoV-2: a household transmission study 92%
- Estimating the transmissibility of SARS-CoV-2 during periods of high, low and zero case incidence 92%
- Rapid feedback on hospital onset SARS-CoV-2 infections combining epidemiological and sequencing data 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- The spatio-temporal distribution of COVID-19 infection in England between January and June 2020 93%
- Spatial Growth Rate of Emerging SARS-CoV-2 Lineages in England, September 2020–December 2021 92%
- Comparative transmission of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron (B.1.1.529) and Delta (B.1.617.2) variants and the impact of vaccination: national cohort study, England 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Appropriately smoothing prevalence data to inform estimates of growth rate and reproduction number 93%
- Estimating the impact of test-trace-isolate-quarantine systems on SARS-CoV-2 transmission in Australia 93%
- Effectiveness of a COVID-19 contact tracing app in a simulation model with indirect and informal contact tracing 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Estimating the trend of COVID-19 in Norway by combining multiple surveillance indicators 92%
- Key performance indicators of COVID-19 contact tracing in Belgium from September 2020 to December 2021 92%
- Identifying Optimal COVID-19 Testing Strategies for Schools and Businesses: Balancing Testing Frequency, Individual Test Technology, and Cost 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.