Back

Different tissues in the maternal-fetal interface harbor distinct microbiomes showing associations related to their anatomical position or function

Li, X.; Jiang, W.; Dai, L.; Liu, G.; YU, B.; Fang, M.

2022-11-30 microbiology
10.1101/2022.11.29.518443 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The human placenta was thought to be sterile in healthy pregnancies which has been challenged by the development of DNA sequence-based techniques, although it is still open to controversy. Nonetheless, little is known whether different parts of fetal appurtenances contain district microbiome profiles. Here, DNA 16S rRNA sequencing was performed of the amniotic fluid cells (AC), amnion membrane (AM), the placenta of fetal surface (remove the amniotic membrane, PL), maternal blood (MB), and umbilical cord blood (UCB) at V3-V4 hypervariable region from participants with cesarean delivery. Then sequence raw data were followed by taxonomic classification at 97% similarity and diversity analysis at the genus level. The differences and associations among the five tissues were analyzed. At the phylum composition level, the most abundant microorganisms were Proteobacteria in all five tissues, and followed by Firmicutes in AC, AM, and MB groups, Actinobacteria in UCB and Bacteroidetes in PL, respectively. As the maternal-fetal barrier, PL and AM had the lower OUT number and weaker co-occurrence network compared with the other three tissues. At the beta diversity clustering level, the microbiota constituents in the MB and UCB were highly similar; the microbiota profiles of PL and AM were also remarkably alike; AC was immensely different from those two clusters. Therefore, the five tissues were distinctly separated into three clusters. Our study reveals that different pregnancy-related anatomical sites harbor unique microbial compositions and show different degrees of correlation with other tissues.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.