Back

Dual functions of labial resolve the Hox logic of chelicerate head segments

Gainett, G.; Klementz, B. C.; Blaszczyk, P. O.; Bruce, H.; Patel, N.; Sharma, P. P.

2022-12-01 developmental biology
10.1101/2022.11.29.518396 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Despite an abundance of gene expression surveys, comparatively little is known about Hox gene function in Chelicerata, with emphasis on the Hox logic of the anterior prosomal segments, which bear the mouthparts. Previous investigations of individual paralogs of labial (lab) and Deformed (Dfd) in the spider Parasteatoda tepidariorum have shown that these play a role in tissue maintenance of the pedipalpal segment (labial-1) and in patterning the first walking leg identity (Deformed-1), respectively. However, broader extrapolations of these data points across chelicerates are hindered by the existence of duplicated copies of Hox genes in arachnopulmonates (e.g., spiders and scorpions), which have resulted from an ancient whole genome duplication event. Here, we investigated the function of single-copy orthologs of lab in the harvestman Phalangium opilio, an exemplar of a lineage that was not subject of this whole genome duplication. Embryonic RNAi against lab resulted in homeotic transformations of pedipalps to chelicerae, as well as reduction and fusion of the pedipalpal segment with adjacent segments. To test for combinatorial function, we performed double knockdown of lab and Dfd, which results in homeotic transformation of both pedipalps and first walking legs into cheliceral identity, whereas the second walking leg is transformed into a pedipalpal identity. Taken together, these results elucidate a model for the Hox logic of head segments in Chelicerata. To substantiate the validity of this model, we additionally performed expression surveys for duplicated copies of lab and Dfd in scorpions and horseshoe crabs, toward understanding the genetic basis of a heteronomous prosoma. We show that repetition of morphologically similar appendages is correlated with uniform expression levels of the Hox genes lab and Dfd, irrespective of the number of gene copies.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
EvoDevo
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
21.9%
2
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 1%
12.0%
3
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 15%
6.1%
4
Developmental Biology
134 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.1%
5
Developmental Dynamics
50 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.7%
50% of probability mass above
6
Development
440 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.7%
7
Molecular Biology and Evolution
488 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.9%
8
Developmental Cell
168 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.5%
9
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 16%
3.5%
10
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 7%
3.5%
11
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.7%
12
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.7%
13
Open Biology
95 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.0%
14
Evolution & Development
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
15
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.8%
16
Journal of Comparative Neurology
66 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
17
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 35%
1.4%
18
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 23%
1.2%
19
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
20
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 67%
1.2%
21
Biology Open
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
22
Genetics
225 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
23
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.9%
24
Journal of Experimental Zoology Part B: Molecular and Developmental Evolution
22 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
25
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
26
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%