Back

The impact of assortative mating, participation bias, and socioeconomic status on the polygenic risk of behavioral and psychiatric traits

Cabrera Mendoza, B.; Wendt, F.; Pathak, G. A.; Yengo, L.; Polimanti, R.

2022-11-30 genetic and genomic medicine
10.1101/2022.11.29.22282912 medRxiv
Show abstract

To investigate assortative mating (AM), participation bias, and socioeconomic status (SES) with respect to the genetics of behavioral and psychiatric traits, we analyzed gametic phase disequilibrium (GPD), within-spouses and within-siblings polygenic risk score (PRS) correlation, performing a SES conditional analysis. We observed genetic signatures of AM across multiple methods for traits related to substance use with SES conditioning increasing the within-spouses PRS correlation for Frequency of drinking alcohol (2.5% to 6%), Maximum habitual alcohol intake (1.33% to 4.43%), and Ever taken cannabis (1.5% to 5.3%). Comparing UK Biobank mental health questionnaire responders vs. non-responders, major depressive disorder PRS showed significant GPD in both groups when based on the Million Veteran Program (3.2% vs. 3%), but only in responders when based on the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium (3.8% vs. 0.2%). These results highlight the impact of AM, participation bias, and SES on the polygenic risk of behavioral and psychiatric traits.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.