Sequence Controlled Secondary Structure Determines Site-selectivity of Lanthipeptides
Mi, X.; Desormeaux, E. K.; Le, T.; van der Donk, W.; Shukla, D.
Show abstract
Lanthipeptides are ribosomally synthesized and post-translationally modified peptides that are generated from precursor peptides through a dehydration and cyclization process in the biosynthetic pathways. In contrast to most other lanthipeptide synthetases, ProcM, a class II lanthipeptide synthetase, demonstrates high substrate tolerance. It is enigmatic that a single enzyme can catalyze the cyclization process of a diverse range of substrates with high fidelity. Previous studies suggested that the site-selectivity of lanthionine formation is determined by substrate sequence rather than by the enzyme. However, exactly how substrate sequence contributes to site-selective lanthipeptide biosynthesis is not clear. In this study, we performed molecular dynamic simulations for ProcA3.3 core peptide variants to explore how the predicted solution structure of the substrate without enzyme correlates to final product formation. Our simulation results support a model in which the secondary structure of the core peptide controls the ring pattern of the final product. We also demonstrate that the dehydration step in the biosynthesis pathway does not influence the site-selectivity of ring formation. In addition, we performed simulation for the core peptides of ProcA1.1 and 2.8, which are well-suited candidates to investigate the connection between order of ring formation and solution structure. Simulation results indicate that in both cases, C-terminal ring formation is more likely which was supported by experimental results. Our findings indicate that the substrate sequence and its solution structure can be used to predict the site-selectivity and order of ring formation, and that secondary structure is a crucial factor influencing the site-selectivity. Taken together, these findings will facilitate our understanding of the lanthipeptide biosynthetic mechanism and accelerate bioengineering efforts for lanthipeptide-derived products.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Rational design of protein-specific folding modifiers 96%
- Semi-synthetic CoA-alpha-Synuclein Constructs Trap N-terminal Acetyltransferase NatB for Binding Mechanism Studies 96%
- Shaping the Glycan Landscape: Hidden relationships between linkage and ring distortions induced by carbohydrate-active enzymes 96%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Engineered chimeras unveil swappable modular features of fatty acid and polyketide synthase acyl carrier proteins 97%
- Kinetic Characterization and Computational Modeling of the Escherichia coli Heptosyltransferase II: Exploring the Role of Protein Dynamics in Catalysis for a GT-B Glycosyltransferase 96%
- Oncogenic mutations in the DNA-binding domain of FOXO1 disrupt folding: quantitative insights from experiments and molecular simulations 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effects of Familial Alzheimer's Disease Mutations on the Folding Free Energy and Dipole-Dipole Interactions of the Amyloid β-Peptide 95%
- An interaction between the transmembrane domains of Streptococcus pyogenes sortase A and its endogenous substrate M protein revealed by molecular dynamics simulations 95%
- Computational Analysis of Threonine Ladders on Distinct Beta-Solenoid Scaffolds, with Implications for the Design of Novel Antifreeze Proteins 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Conformational Dynamics and Catalytic Backups in a Hyper-Thermostable Engineered Archaeal Protein Tyrosine Phosphatase 96%
- Catalytic Redundancies and Conformational Plasticity Drives Selectivity and Promiscuity in Quorum Quenching Lactonases 96%
- Dynamical nonequilibrium molecular dynamics simulations identify allosteric sites and positions associated with drug resistance in the SARS-CoV-2 main protease 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.