The human sperm head spins with a conserved direction during swimming in 3D
Corkidi, G.; Montoya, F.; Gonzalez-Cota, A. L.; Hernandez-Herrera, P.; Bruce, N. C.; Bloomfield-Gadelha, H.; Darszon, A.
Show abstract
In human sperm, head spinning is essential for sperm swimming and critical for fertilization. Measurement of head spinning has not been straightforward due to its symmetric head morphology, its translucent nature and fast 3D motion driven by its helical flagellum movement. Microscope image acquisition has been mostly restricted to 2D single focal plane images limited to head position tracing, in absence of head orientation and rotation in 3D. To date, human sperm spinning has been reported to be mono or bidirectional, and even intermittently changing direction. This variety in head spinning direction, however, appears to contradict observations of conserved helical beating of the human sperm flagellum. Here, we reconcile these observations by directly measuring the head spinning movement of freely swimming human sperm with multi-plane 4D microscopy. We show that 2D microscopy is unable to distinguish the spinning direction in human sperm. We evaluated the head spinning of 409 spermatozoa in four different conditions: in non-capacitating and capacitating solutions, for both aqueous and viscous media. All spinning spermatozoa, regardless of the experimental conditions spun counterclockwise (CCW) as seen from head-to-tail. Head spinning was suppressed in 57% of spermatozoa swimming in non-capacitating viscous media, though, interestingly, they recovered the CCW spinning after incubation in capacitating conditions within the same viscous medium. Our observations show that the spinning direction in human sperm is conserved, even when recovered from non-spin, indicating the presence of a robust and persistent helical driving mechanism powering the human sperm flagellum, thus of critical importance in future sperm motility assessments, human reproduction research and microorganism self-organised swimming.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- An evaluation of multi-excitation-wavelength standing-wave fluorescence microscopy (TartanSW) to improve sampling density in studies of the cell membrane and cytoskeleton 95%
- Ultra-thin fluorocarbon foils optimize multiscale imaging of three-dimensional native and optically cleared specimens 94%
- Lightsheet Optical Tweezer (LOT) for Optical Manipulation of Microscopic Particles and Live Cells 94%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.