Segment and Slice: A Two-Step Deep Learning Pipeline for Opportunistic Vertebral Fracture Detection in Computed Tomography
Glessgen, C. G.; Cyriac, J.; Yang, S.; Manneck, S.; Wichtmann, H.; Wasserthal, J.; Kovacs, B.; Harder, D.
Show abstract
ObjectivesAn end-to-end method is introduced to build a combined segmentation-classification pipeline using deep learning for opportunistic fracture detection in CT spine images of varying field-of-views. Materials and MethodsThis retrospective study builds on 452 CTs of the lumbar/thoracolumbar spine. Patients were included based on the evidence of [≥] 1 vertebral body fracture and excluded in case of history of spinal surgery or pathologic fractures. The collective was split into training/validation (405) and test (47) sets. An open-source pre-segmented spine dataset was used to train a preliminary segmentation model, which was applied on the training set. The resulting segmentation was post-processed to remove posterior vertebral structures and if needed manually refined by a radiologist. Using the refined version as new training data, a final segmentation nnU-net was trained. Sagittal slices from each vertebra were labelled individually with regard to fracture evidence. Slices without signs of fracture were used as negative class. 27,019 slices (20,396 negative, 6,623 positive) trained a classification algorithm using resnet18. Two senior readers independently assessed fractures in the test set to obtain a consensual ground truth. The segmentation-classification pipeline was applied to the test set and compared to the ground truth. ResultsThe segmentation model correctly segmented 330/339 (97%) vertebrae. Considering every segmented vertebra, the classifier detected fractures with 88% sensitivity, 95% specificity and 93% accuracy. ConclusionOur two-step method can help to detect spine fractures on images of varying field-of-views, with an accuracy comparable to that of a radiologist in-training. The final models as well as our code material are available at https://github.com/usb-radiology/VertebraeFx.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Assessing GPT-4 Multimodal Performance in Radiological Image Analysis 93%
- Fully automatic segmentation of craniomaxillofacial CT scans for computer-assisted orthognathic surgery planning using the nnU-Net framework 93%
- Pairwise learning of MRI scans using a convolutional Siamese network for prediction of knee pain 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- MyoVision-US: an Artificial Intelligence-Powered Software for Automated Analysis of Skeletal Muscle Ultrasonography 93%
- Evaluation of longitudinal time-lapsed in vivo micro-CT for monitoring fracture healing in mouse femur defect models 93%
- Integrating Multidimensional Data Analytics for Precision Diagnosis of Chronic Low Back Pain 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Investigating the relationship between internal spinal alignment and back shape in patients with scoliosis using PCdare: a comparative, reliability and validation study 95%
- Functional Aspects of the Eustachian Tube by Means of 3D-Modeling 93%
- Real-time three-dimensional MRI for the assessment of dynamic carpal instability 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparing performance of deep convolutional neural network with orthopaedic surgeons on identification of total hip prosthesis design from plain radiographs 92%
- Fully Automated Explainable Abdominal CT Contrast Media Phase Classification Using Organ Segmentation and Machine Learning 92%
- Phase Recognition in Contrast-Enhanced CT Scans based on Deep Learning and Random Sampling 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Automated Segmentation of Fractured Distal Radii by 3D Geodesic Active Contouring of in vivo HR-pQCT Images 97%
- Large-scale quantification of human osteocyte lacunar morphological biomarkers as assessed by ultra-high-resolution desktop micro-computed tomography 93%
- Large-scale osteocyte lacunar morphological analysis of transiliac bone in normal and osteoporotic premenopausal women 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.