Assessing the Causal Effect of Blood Pressure on Renal Cancer in the UK Biobank via Mendelian Randomisation
Clifton, L.; Liu, X.; Collister, J. A.; Littlejohns, T. J.; Hunter, D. J.
Show abstract
1.BackgroundHypertension is associated with increasing risk of renal cancer in observational studies, but there is insufficient evidence on whether hypertension is a causal factor for renal cancer. MethodsWe analysed data from 313,520 individuals of White British ancestry aged 40-69 years at baseline from the UK Biobank prospective cohort. We used polygenic risk scores (PRS) for SBP and DBP, respectively, in Mendelian randomisation analyses to assess the causal effect of blood pressure on renal cancer. Our primary outcome is renal-parenchyma cancer, and we used bladder cancer as a negative control. We conducted additional sensitivity analyses, using individual SNPs from the PRS as instruments, to ensure the MR results are robust. ResultsAmong the study population, 1159 participants developed renal-parenchyma cancer over the median of 12.5 years of follow-up. Every 5 mmHg increase in measured SBP and DBP was significantly associated with increased risk for renal-parenchyma cancer (HR: 1.04; 95% CI: 1.02-1.05; p < 0.001 and HR: 1.07; 95% CI: 1.03-1.10; p < 0.001 respectively). Consistent with observational association analyses, we observed statistically significant associations between each 5 mmHg genetically elevated BP and risk of renal-parenchyma cancer, with DBP (HR: 1.17; 95% CI: 1.07-1.27; p < 0.001) having a stronger association than SBP (HR: 1.09; 95% CI: 1.02-1.17; p = 0.009). These significant associations were maintained in sensitivity analyses. We observed a null association of genetically predicted blood pressure with bladder cancer. ConclusionsThese findings provide evidence that elevated BP is causally associated with renal-parenchyma cancer.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Phenome-wide Mendelian randomization study of plasma triglycerides and 2,600 disease traits 94%
- Integrated Analyses of Growth Differentiation Factor-15 Concentration and Cardiometabolic Diseases in Humans 93%
- Risk of Second Primary Cancers After a Diagnosis of First Primary Cancer: A Pan-Cancer Analysis and Mendelian Randomization Study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- A unified framework for estimating country-specific cumulative incidence for 18 diseases stratified by polygenic risk 92%
- Within-family studies for Mendelian randomization: avoiding dynastic, assortative mating, and population stratification biases 92%
- Accounting for genetic effect heterogeneity in fine-mapping and improving power to detect gene-environment interactions with SharePro 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Bias in two-sample Mendelian randomization when using heritable covariable-adjusted summary associations 92%
- Investigating a possible causal relationship between maternal serum urate concentrations and offspring birthweight: A Mendelian randomization study 91%
- An empirical investigation into the impact of winner's curse on estimates from Mendelian randomization 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Using Family History Data to Improve the Power of Association Studies: Application to Cancer in UK Biobank 93%
- Genome-wide pleiotropy analysis identifies novel blood pressure variants and improves its polygenic risk scores 91%
- Refinement of a published gene-physical activity interaction impacting HDL-cholesterol: role of sex and lipoprotein subfractions 91%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.