Back

An international scholastic network to generate LexA enhancer-trap lines for Drosophila

Kim, E. S.; Rajan, A.; Chang, K.; Gulick, C.; English, E.; Nakada, S.; Beard, C.; O'Connor, S.; Mastroianni, S.; Downey, E.; Feigenbaum, M.; Tolentino, C.; Pace, A.; Khan, M.; Moon, S.; DiPrima, J.; Syed, A.; Lin, F.; Govindarajan, S.; Abukhadra, Y.; Bacon, I.; Beckerle, J.; Bloomfield, O.; Cho, S.; Esi Donkor, N.; Garberg, L.; Harrington, A.; Hoang, M.; Lawani, N.; Noori, A.; Park, E.; Parsons, E.; Oravitan, P.; Chen, M.; Molina, C.; Richmond, C.; Reddi, A.; Huang, J.; Shugrue, C.; Coviello, R.; Unver, S.; Indelicarto, M.; Islamovic, E.; McIlroy, R.; Yang, A.; Hamad, M.; Griffin, E.; Ahmed, Z

2022-11-25 genetics
10.1101/2022.11.24.517565 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Conditional gene regulation in Drosophila through binary expression systems like the LexA-LexAop system provides a superb tool for investigating gene and tissue function. To increase the availability of defined LexA enhancer trap insertions, we present molecular, genetic and tissue expression studies of 301 novel Stan-X LexA enhancer traps derived from mobilization of the index SX4 line. This includes insertions into distinct loci on the X, II and III chromosomes that were not previously associated with enhancer traps or targeted LexA constructs, an insertion into ptc, and eleven insertions into natural transposons. A subset of enhancer traps was expressed in CNS neurons known to produce and secrete insulin, an essential regulator of growth, development and metabolism. Fly lines described here were generated and characterized through studies by students and teachers in an international network of genetics classes at public, independent high schools, and universities serving a diversity of students, including those underrepresented in science. Thus, a unique partnership between secondary schools and university-based programs has produced and characterized novel resources in Drosophila, establishing instructional paradigms devoted to unscripted experimental science.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.