Using DEPendency of association on the number of Top Hits (DEPTH) as a complementary tool to identify novel risk loci in colorectal cancer
Lai, J.; Wong, C.; Schmidt, D. F.; Kapuscinski, M.; Alpen, K.; MacInnis, R. J.; Buchanan, D. D.; Win, A. K.; Figueiredo, J.; Chan, A. T.; Harrison, T. A.; Hoffmeister, M.; White, E.; Marchand, L. L.; Peters, U.; Hopper, J. L.; Makalic, E.; Jenkins, M. A.
Show abstract
BackgroundDEPendency of association on the number of Top Hits (DEPTH) is an approach to identify candidate risk regions by considering the risk signals from over-lapping groups of sequential variants across the genome. MethodsWe conducted a DEPTH analysis using a sliding window of 200 SNPs to colorectal cancer (CRC) data from the Colon Cancer Family Registry (CCFR) (5,735 cases and 3,688 controls), and GECCO (8,865 cases and 10,285 controls) studies. A DEPTH score >1 was used to identify risk regions common to both studies. We compared DEPTH results against those from conventional GWAS analyses of these two studies as well as against 132 published risk regions. ResultsInitial DEPTH analysis revealed 2,622 (CCFR) and 3,686 (GECCO) risk regions, of which 569 were common to both studies. Bootstrapping revealed 40 and 49 likely risk regions in the CCFR and GECCO data sets, respectively. Notably, DEPTH identified at least 82 likely risk regions that would not be detected using conventional GWAS methods, nor had they been identified in previous CRC GWASs. We found four reproducible risk regions (2q22.2, 2q33.1, 6p21.32, 13q14.3), with the HLA locus at 6p21 having the highest DEPTH score. The strongest associated SNPs were rs762216297, rs149490268, rs114741460, and rs199707618 for the CCFR data, and rs9270761 for the GECCO data. ConclusionDEPTH can identify novel likely risk regions for CRC not identified using conventional analyses of much larger datasets. ImpactDEPTH has potential as a powerful complementary tool to conventional GWAS analyses for identifying risk regions within the genome.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A new colorectal cancer risk prediction model incorporating family history, personal and environmental factors 94%
- Smoking methylation marks for prediction of urothelial cancer risk 93%
- The Gastric Cancer Registry: A Genomic Translational Resource for Multidisciplinary Research in Stomach Malignancies 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Clinically relevant combined effect of polygenic background, rare pathogenic germline variants, and family history on colorectal cancer incidence 94%
- Co-expression in tissue-specific gene networks links genes in cancer-susceptibility loci to known somatic driver genes 93%
- Exome-wide analysis of copy number variation shows association of the human leukocyte antigen region with asthma in UK Biobank 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Probing the diabetes and colorectal cancer relationship using gene – environment interaction analyses 94%
- Molecular pathways in post-colonoscopy versus detected colorectal cancers: results from a nested case-control study 93%
- MmCMS: Mouse models' Consensus Molecular Subtypes of colorectal cancer 91%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Functional annotation with expression validation identifies novel metastasis-relevant genes from post-GWAS risk loci in sporadic colorectal carcinomas 95%
- Estimating cancer risk in carriers of Lynch syndrome variants in UK Biobank 93%
- Population based targeted sequencing of 54 candidate genes identifies PALB2 as a susceptibility gene for high grade serous ovarian cancer 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.