Co-designing a digital health app to manage pain in young children with cancer: report from the generative design phase of intervention development
Jibb, L.; Sivaratnam, S.; Hashemi, E.; Stinson, J. N.; Nathan, P. C.; Chartrand, J.; Alberts, N. M.; Masama, T.; Pease, H. G.; Torres, L. B.; Cortes, H. G.; Kuczynski, S.; Zworth, M.; Fortier, M. A.
Show abstract
Pain is one of the most prevalent and burdensome pediatric cancer symptoms for young children and their families. A significant proportion of pain episodes are experienced in environments where management options are limited, including at home, and digital innovations such as apps may have positive impacts on pain outcomes for young children in these environments. Our overall aim is to co-design such an app and the objective of this study was to explore the perceptions of childrens parents about app utility, needed system features, and challenges. We recruited parents of young children with cancer and multidisciplinary pediatric oncology clinicians from two pediatric cancer care centers to participate in audio-recorded, semi-structured co-design interviews. We conducted interviews until data saturation was reached. Audio-recordings were then transcribed, coded, and analyzed using thematic analysis. Forty-two participants took part in the process. Participants endorsed the concept of an app as a useful, safe, and convenient way to engage caregivers in managing their young childs pain. The value of the app related to its capacity to provide real-time, multimodal informational and procedural pain support to parents, while also reducing the emotional burden of pain care. Recommendations for intervention design included accessibility-focused features, comprehensive symptom tracking, and embedded scientific- and clinically-sound symptom assessments and management advice. Predicted challenges associated with digital pain management related to potential burden of use for parents and clinicians. The insights gathered will inform the design principles of our future childhood cancer pain digital research. AUTHOR SUMMARYThe lack of meaningful involvement of end-users in intervention development has been a key contributor to difficulties in effectively translating research findings into cancer practice and policy. There is a risk that without the active engagement of children with cancer and their families in designing digital health innovations, researchers and clinicians will fall victim to an unfortunate cycle of producing underutilized evidence--resulting in a limited impact on patient outcomes. Pain is a particular problem for young children with cancer and real-time digital health interventions may be solutions for accessible, effective, and scalable cancer pain management. We are using an established end user-centered co-design process to engage parents and pediatric oncology clinicians in the development of a cancer pain management app. Our work here summarizes the generative co-design phase of this process and the perceptions of parents and clinicians related to app usefulness and needed system features.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Suitability of just-in-time adaptive intervention in post-COVID-19-related symptoms: A systematic scoping review 92%
- Feasibility characteristics of wrist-worn fitness trackers in health status monitoring for post-COVID patients in remote and rural areas 92%
- Developing contents for a digital drug adherence tool with reminder cues and personalized feedback: a formative mixed-methods study among children and adolescents living with HIV in Tanzania 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluating the effectiveness of mindfulness alone compared to exercise and mindfulness on fatigue in women with gynaecology cancer (GEMS): Protocol for a randomised feasibility trial 92%
- Can a specific biobehavioral based therapeutic education program lead to changes in pain perception and brain plasticity biomarkers in chronic pain patients? A study protocol for a randomized clinical trial 91%
- Evaluating user experience with immersive technology in simulation-based education: a modified Delphi study with qualitative analysis 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Improving Patient Engagement in Phase 2 Clinical Trials with a Trial-specific Patient Decision Aid (tPDA): A Development and Usability Study 93%
- Guided relaxation-based virtual reality transiently reduces acute postoperative pain and anxiety in a pediatric population 91%
- Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based Chatbots in Promoting Health Behavioral Changes: A Systematic Review 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Mobile Phone Virtual Reality Game for Pediatric Home Burn Dressing Pain Management, a Randomized Clinical Trial 94%
- Real-time Auditory Feedback for Improving Gait and Walking in People with Parkinson’s Disease: A Pilot and Feasibility Trial 90%
- Implementation of an internet-based stress management program in micro- and small-sized enterprises: A study protocol for a pre-post feasibility study of the effectiveness-implementation hybrid type 2 trial 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Design and Formative Evaluation of a Voice-based Virtual Coach for Problem-Solving Treatment 92%
- Applications and barriers to use of an mHealth iPhone application for self-management of chronic recurrent medical conditions: A Pilot Study 92%
- Exploring Patient and Staff Experiences of Video Consultations During COVID-19 in an English Outpatient Care Setting: Secondary Data Analysis of Routinely Collected Feedback Data 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.