Efficacy of Non-invasive Brain Stimulation on Vision: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Bello, U. M.; Wang, J.; Park, A. S.; Tan, K. W.; Cheung, B. W.; Thompson, B. B.; Cheong, A. M.
Show abstract
ObjectiveMultiple studies have explored the use of non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) to enhance visual function. These studies vary in sample size, outcome measures, and NIBS methodology. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analyses to assess the effects of NIBS on visual functions in human participants with normal vision. MethodsWe followed the PRISMA guidelines, and a review protocol was registered with PROSPERO before study commencement (CRD42021255882). We searched Embase, Medline, PsychInfo, PubMed, OpenGrey and Web of Science using relevant keywords. The search covered the period from 1st January 2000 until 1st September 2021. Comprehensive meta-analysis (CMA) software was used for quantitative analysis. ResultsForty-nine studies were included, of which 19 were included in a meta-analysis (38.8%). Meta-analysis indicated acute (Hedgess g=0.232, 95% CI: 0.023-0.442, p=0.029) and aftereffects (0.590, 95% CI: 0.182-0.998, p=0.005) of transcranial electrical stimulation (tES, including three different stimulation protocols) on contrast sensitivity. Visual evoked potential (VEP) amplitudes were significantly enhanced immediately after tES (0.383, 95% CI: 0.110-0.665, p=0.006). Both tES (0.563, 95% CI: 0.230 to 0.896, p=0.001)] and anodal-transcranial direct current stimulation (a-tDCS) alone (0.655, 95% CI: 0.273 to 1.038, p=0.001) reduced crowding in peripheral vision. The effects of NIBS on visual acuity, motion perception and reaction time were not statistically significant. ConclusionsThere are significant effects of visual cortex NIBS on contrast sensitivity, VEP amplitude, an index of cortical excitability, and crowding among normally sighted individuals. Future studies with robust experimental designs are needed to substantiate these findings in populations with vision loss. PROSPERO registration numberCRD42021255882 HighlightsO_LIWe conducted a meta-analysis and a systematic review on the efficacy of non-invasive brain stimulation for improving on visual function C_LIO_LIVisual cortex non-invasive brain stimulation can enhance contrast sensitivity, reduce crowding in peripheral vision and enhance visually evoked potential amplitude among normally sighted individuals. C_LI
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Reduction of collinear inhibition in observers with central vision loss using anodal transcranial direct current stimulation: A case series. 96%
- The role of the parietal lobe in task-irrelevant suppression during learning 93%
- Enhancement of Temporal Processing via Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Feasibility of Remotely Supervised Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Cognitive Remediation: A Systematic Review 93%
- Anodal M1 tDCS enhances online learning of rhythmic timing videogame skill 93%
- Unilateral cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation over the parietal area modulates on postural control depending with eyes open and closed 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Immersive virtual prism adaptation therapy with depth sensing camera: A feasibility study with functional near infrared spectroscopy in healthy adults 92%
- Tactile versus Motor Imagery: Differences in Corticospinal Excitability Assessed with single-pulse TMS 91%
- Short periods of bipolar anodal TDCS induce no instantaneous dose-dependent increase in cerebral blood flow in the targeted human motor cortex 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cerebellar tDCS alters the perception of optic flow 95%
- Investigation of neuromodulatory effect of anodal cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation on the primary motor cortex using functional near-infrared spectroscopy 95%
- The polarity specific nature of single session high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation to the cerebellum and prefrontal cortex on motor and non-motor task performance 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Combining muscle-computer interface guided training with bihemispheric tDCS improves upper limb function in chronic stroke patients 93%
- No support for the effect of tDCS on frontal alpha asymmetry and behavioral and brain activity indices of inhibitory control 93%
- Theta-burst stimulation over primary somatosensory cortex modulates tactile acuity of tongue 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.