Back

A fast blind source separation algorithm for decomposing ultrafast ultrasound images into spatiotemporal muscle unit kinematics

Rohlen, R.; Lundsberg, J.; Malesevic, N.; Antfolk, C.

2022-11-24 bioengineering
10.1101/2022.11.22.517488 bioRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveUltrasound can detect individual motor unit (MU) activity during voluntary isometric contractions based on their subtle axial displacements. The detection pipeline, currently performed offline, is based on displacement velocity images and identifying the subtle axial displacements. This identification can preferably be made through a blind source separation (BSS) algorithm with the feasibility of translating the pipeline from offline to online. However, the question remains how to reduce the computational time for the BSS algorithm, which includes demixing tissue velocities from many different sources, e.g., the active MU displacements, arterial pulsations, bones, connective tissue, and noise. ApproachThis study proposes a fast velocity-based BSS (velBSS) algorithm suitable for online purposes that decomposes velocity images from low-force voluntary isometric contractions into spatiotemporal components associated with single MU activities. The proposed algorithm will be compared against stICA, i.e., the method used in previous papers, for various subjects, ultrasound- and EMG systems, where the latter acts as MU reference recordings. Main resultsWe found that the spatial and temporal correlation between the MU-associated components from velBSS and stICA was high (0.86 {+/-} 0.05 and 0.87 {+/-} 0.06). The spike-triggered averaged twitch responses (using the MU spike trains from EMG) had an extremely high correlation (0.99 {+/-} 0.01). In addition, the computational time for velBSS was at least 50 times less than for stICA. SignificanceThe present algorithm (velBSS) outperforms the currently available method (stICA). It provides a promising translation towards an online pipeline and will be important in the continued development of this research field of functional neuromuscular imaging.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
40 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.1%
2
Journal of Neural Engineering
221 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
19.1%
3
IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.1%
50% of probability mass above
4
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 24%
6.9%
5
Biomedical Signal Processing and Control
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.5%
6
Sensors
43 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.7%
7
Computers in Biology and Medicine
128 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.7%
8
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 42%
2.5%
9
IEEE Access
35 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.5%
10
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
28 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
11
Frontiers in Neuroscience
256 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
12
Bioengineering
29 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.2%
13
Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
14
Brain Stimulation
125 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.0%
15
IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
16
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 18%
1.0%
17
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
37 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
18
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 63%
0.9%
19
NeuroImage
903 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
20
Human Brain Mapping
329 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
21
Imaging Neuroscience
282 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
22
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
77 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%