Back

Supramodal Shape Representation in the Human Brain

Xu, Y.; Vignali, L.; Sigismondi, F.; Crepaldi, D.; Bottini, R.; Collignon, O.

2022-11-22 neuroscience
10.1101/2022.11.22.517472 bioRxiv
Show abstract

We can sense an objects shape by vision or touch. Previous studies suggested that the inferolateral occipitotemporal cortex (ILOTC) implements supramodal shape representations as it responds more to seeing or touching objects than shapeless textures. However, such activation in the anterior portion of the ventral visual pathway could be due to the conceptual representation of an object or visual imagery triggered by touching an object. We addressed these possibilities by directly comparing shape and conceptual representations in early blind (who lack visual experience/imagery) and sighted participants. We found that bilateral ILOTC in both groups showed stronger activation during a shape verification task than during a conceptual verification task made on the names of the same manmade objects. Moreover, the distributed activity in the ILOTC encoded shape similarity but not conceptual association among objects. Besides the ILOTC, we also found shape representation in both groups bilateral ventral premotor cortices and intraparietal sulcus, a frontoparietal circuit relating to object grasping and haptic processing. In contrast, the conceptual verification task activated both groups left perisylvian brain network relating to language processing, and, interestingly, the cuneus in early blind participants only. The ILOTC had stronger functional connectivity to frontoparietal circuit than to the left perisylvian network, forming a modular structure specialized in shape representation. Our results conclusively support that the ILOTC selectively implements shape representation independently of visual experience, and this unique functionality likely comes from its privileged connection to the frontoparietal haptic circuit.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.