NMY-2, TOE-2 and PIG-1 Regulate C. elegans Asymmetric Cell Divisions
Robinson, J. D.; Teuliere, J.; Yoo, S.; Garriga, G.
Show abstract
Asymmetric cell division (ACD) is an important mechanism that generates cellular diversity during development. Not only do asymmetric cell divisions produce daughter cells of different fates, many can produce daughters of different sizes, which we refer to as Daughter Cell Size Asymmetry (DCSA). In C. elegans, apoptotic cells are frequently produced by asymmetric divisions that exhibit DCSA, where the smaller daughter dies. We focus here on the divisions of the Q.a and Q.p neuroblasts, which produce apoptotic cells and divide with opposite polarity using both distinct and overlapping mechanisms. The PIG-1/MELK and TOE-2 proteins both regulate DCSA and specify the apoptotic cell fate in both the Q.a and Q.p divisions. In many asymmetric cell divisions, the non-muscle myosin NMY-2 is involved in properly positioning the cleavage furrow to produce daughters of unequal size. It was previously reported that NMY-2 is asymmetrically distributed and required for the DCSA of Q.a but not Q.p. In this study, we examined endogenously tagged reporters of NMY-2, TOE-2, and PIG-1 and found that all were asymmetric at the cortex during both the Q.a and Q.p divisions. TOE-2 and NMY-2 were biased toward the side of the dividing cell that would produce the smaller daughter, whereas PIG-1 was biased toward the side that would produce the larger daughter. We used temperature-sensitive nmy-2 mutants to determine the role of nmy-2 in these divisions and found that these mutants only displayed DCSA defects in the Q.p division. We generated double mutant combinations between the nmy-2 mutations and mutations in toe-2 and pig-1. The nmy-2 mutations did not significantly alter the DCSA of the toe-2 and pig-1 mutants but did alter the fate of the Q.a and Q.p daughters. This finding suggests that NMY-2 functions together with TOE-2 and PIG-1 to regulate DCSA but plays an independent role in specifying the fate of the Q.a and Q.p descendants.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Functions of the Bloom Syndrome Helicase N-terminal Intrinsically Disordered Region 96%
- Insights into the involvement of spliceosomal mutations in myelodysplastic disorders from an analysis of SACY-1/DDX41 in Caenorhabditis elegans 94%
- Caenorhabditis elegans junctophilin has tissue-specific functions and regulates neurotransmission with extended-synaptotagmin 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Transcription factors regulating the fate and developmental potential of a multipotent progenitor in C. elegans 95%
- The conserved ASCL1/MASH-1 ortholog HLH-3 specifies sex-specific ventral cord motor neuron fate in C. elegans 94%
- A Genetic Screen for Temperature-sensitive Morphogenesis-defective Caenorhabditis elegans Mutants 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Reduction of Derlin activity suppresses Notch-dependent tumours in the C. elegans germ line 96%
- Rad21l1 cohesin subunit is dispensable for spermatogenesis but not oogenesis in zebrafish 94%
- The Chromatin Remodeling Protein CHD-1 and the EFL-1/DPL-1 Transcription Factor Cooperatively Down Regulate CDK-2 to Control SAS-6 Levels and Centriole Number 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- A temporal sequence of heterochronic gene activities promotes stage-specific developmental events in C. elegans 95%
- Function of cell adhesion molecules in differentiation of ray sensory neurons in C. elegans. 94%
- A deficiency screen of the X chromosome for Rap1 GTPase dominant interacting genes in Drosophila border cell migration 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Arf-GEF Steppke promotes F-actin accumulation, cell protrusions and tissue sealingduring Drosophila dorsal closure 95%
- Imp is required for timely exit from quiescence in Drosophila type II neuroblasts 94%
- Genetic interactions among ADAMTS metalloproteases and basement membrane molecules in cell migration in Caenorhabditis elegans 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.