Back

Hamsters are a model for COVID-19 alveolar regeneration mechanisms: an opportunity to understand post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2

Heydemann, L.; Ciurkiewicz, M.; Beythien, G.; Becker, K.; Schughart, K.; Stanelle-Bertram, S.; Schaumburg, B.; Mounogou-Kouassi, N.; Beck, S.; Zickler, M.; Kuehnel, M.; Gabriel, G.; Beineke, A.; Baumgaertner, W.; Armando, F.

2022-11-18 pathology
10.1101/2022.11.17.515635 bioRxiv
Show abstract

A relevant number of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) survivors suffers from post-acute sequelae of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (PASC). Current evidence suggests a dysregulated alveolar regeneration in COVID-19 as a possible explanation for respiratory PASC symptoms, a phenomenon which deserves further investigation in a suitable animal model. This study investigates morphological, phenotypical and transcriptomic features of alveolar regeneration in SARS-CoV-2 infected Syrian golden hamsters. We demonstrate that CK8+ alveolar differentiation intermediate (ADI) cells occur following SARS-CoV-2-induced diffuse alveolar damage. A subset of ADI cells shows nuclear accumulation of TP53 at 6- and 14-days post infection (dpi), indicating a prolonged arrest in the ADI state. Transcriptome data show the expression of gene signatures driving ADI cell senescence, epithelial-mesenchymal transition, and angiogenesis. Moreover, we show that multipotent CK14+ airway basal cell progenitors migrate out of terminal bronchioles, aiding alveolar regeneration. At 14 dpi, presence of ADI cells, peribronchiolar proliferates, M2-type macrophages, and sub-pleural fibrosis is observed, indicating incomplete alveolar restoration. The results demonstrate that the hamster model reliably phenocopies indicators of a dysregulated alveolar regeneration of COVID-19 patients. The results provide important information on a translational COVID-19 model, which is crucial for its application in future research addressing pathomechanisms of PASC and in testing of prophylactic and therapeutic approaches for this syndrome.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.