Blind validation of MSIntuit, an AI-based pre-screening tool for MSI detection from histology slides of colorectal cancer
Saillard, C.; Dubois, R.; Tchita, O.; Loiseau, N.; Garcia, T.; Adriansen, A.; Carpentier, S.; Reyre, J.; Enea, D.; Kamoun, A.; Rossat, S.; Sefta, M.; Auffret, M.; Guillou, L.; Fouillet, A.; Svrcek, M.; Kather, J. N.
Show abstract
ObjectiveMismatch Repair Deficiency (dMMR) / Microsatellite Instability (MSI) is a key biomarker in colorectal cancer (CRC). Universal screening of CRC patients for dMMR/MSI status is now recommended, but contributes to increased workload for pathologists and delayed therapeutic decisions. Deep learning has the potential to ease dMMR/MSI testing in clinical practice, yet no comprehensive validation of a clinically approved tool has been conducted. DesignWe developed an MSI pre-screening tool, MSIntuit, that uses deep learning to identify MSI status from H&E slides. For training, we used 859 slides from the TCGA database. A blind validation was subsequently performed on an independent dataset of 600 consecutive CRC patients. Each slide was digitised using Phillips-UFS and Ventana-DP200 scanners. Thirty dMMR/MSI slides were used for calibration on each scanner. Prediction was then performed on the remaining 570 patients following an automated quality check step. The inter and intra-scanner reliability was studied to assess MSIntuits robustness. ResultsMSIntuit reached a sensitivity and specificity of 97% (95% CI: 93-100%) / 46% (42-50%) on DP200 and of 95% (90-98%) / 47% (43-51%) on UFS scanner. MSIntuit reached excellent agreement on the two scanners (Cohens {kappa}: 0.82) and was repeatable across multiple rescanning of the same slide (Fleiss {kappa}: 0.82). ConclusionWe performed a successful blind validation of the first clinically approved AI-based tool for MSI detection from H&E slides. MSIntuit reaches sensitivity comparable to gold standard methods (92-95%) while ruling out almost half of the non-MSI population, paving the way for its use in clinical practice.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Image-Based Consensus Molecular Subtyping in Rectal Cancer Biopsies and Response to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy 96%
- A Deep Learning Model for Molecular Label Transfer that Enables Cancer Cell Identification from Histopathology Images 94%
- Generalizing AI-driven Assessment of Immunohistochemistry across Immunostains and Cancer Types: A Universal Immunohistochemistry Analyzer 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- A histomorphological atlas of resected mesothelioma discovered by self-supervised learning from 3446 whole-slide images 94%
- Artificial intelligence-based histopathology image analysis identifies a novel subset of endometrial cancers with distinct genomic features and unfavourable outcome 94%
- METI: Deep profiling of tumor ecosystems by integrating cell morphology and spatial transcriptomics 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Multi-resolution deep learning characterizestertiary lymphoid structures in solid tumors 95%
- A user-friendly tool for cloud-based whole slide image segmentation, with examples from renal histopathology 92%
- LUNAR: A Deep Learning Model to Predict Glioma Recurrence Using Integrated Genomic and Clinical Data 91%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.