Back

Blind validation of MSIntuit, an AI-based pre-screening tool for MSI detection from histology slides of colorectal cancer

Saillard, C.; Dubois, R.; Tchita, O.; Loiseau, N.; Garcia, T.; Adriansen, A.; Carpentier, S.; Reyre, J.; Enea, D.; Kamoun, A.; Rossat, S.; Sefta, M.; Auffret, M.; Guillou, L.; Fouillet, A.; Svrcek, M.; Kather, J. N.

2022-11-18 oncology
10.1101/2022.11.17.22282460 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveMismatch Repair Deficiency (dMMR) / Microsatellite Instability (MSI) is a key biomarker in colorectal cancer (CRC). Universal screening of CRC patients for dMMR/MSI status is now recommended, but contributes to increased workload for pathologists and delayed therapeutic decisions. Deep learning has the potential to ease dMMR/MSI testing in clinical practice, yet no comprehensive validation of a clinically approved tool has been conducted. DesignWe developed an MSI pre-screening tool, MSIntuit, that uses deep learning to identify MSI status from H&E slides. For training, we used 859 slides from the TCGA database. A blind validation was subsequently performed on an independent dataset of 600 consecutive CRC patients. Each slide was digitised using Phillips-UFS and Ventana-DP200 scanners. Thirty dMMR/MSI slides were used for calibration on each scanner. Prediction was then performed on the remaining 570 patients following an automated quality check step. The inter and intra-scanner reliability was studied to assess MSIntuits robustness. ResultsMSIntuit reached a sensitivity and specificity of 97% (95% CI: 93-100%) / 46% (42-50%) on DP200 and of 95% (90-98%) / 47% (43-51%) on UFS scanner. MSIntuit reached excellent agreement on the two scanners (Cohens {kappa}: 0.82) and was repeatable across multiple rescanning of the same slide (Fleiss {kappa}: 0.82). ConclusionWe performed a successful blind validation of the first clinically approved AI-based tool for MSI detection from H&E slides. MSIntuit reaches sensitivity comparable to gold standard methods (92-95%) while ruling out almost half of the non-MSI population, paving the way for its use in clinical practice.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.