Back

High Throughput Transcriptomics to Understand Chemical Drivers of Racial Disparities in Breast Cancer

Sala-Hamrick, K. E.; Tapaswi, A.; Polemi, K. M.; Colacino, J. A.

2022-11-18 cancer biology
10.1101/2022.11.16.516817 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundThe impact of chemical exposures on breast cancer progression is poorly characterized and may influence the development of more severe and aggressive subtypes. ObjectivesThere is a suite of toxicants, including metals, pesticides, and personal care product compounds, which are commonly detected at high levels in US Center for Disease Controls National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) chemical biomarker screens. To characterize the impact of these toxicants on breast cancer pathways, we performed high throughput dose-response transcriptomic analysis of toxicant exposed breast cells. MethodsWe treated non-tumorigenic mammary epithelial cells, MCF10A, with 21 chemicals at four doses (25nM, 250nM, 2.5{micro}M, 25{micro}M) for 48 hours. We conducted RNA-sequencing for these 408 samples, adapting the PlexWell plate-based RNA-sequencing method to analyze changes in gene expression resulting from these exposures. For each chemical, we calculated gene and biological pathway specific benchmark doses using BMDExpress2, identifying differentially expressed genes and generating the best fit benchmark dose models for each gene. We employed enrichment testing to test whether each chemicals upregulated or downregulated genes were over-represented in a biological process or pathway. We contextualized benchmark doses relative to human population biomarker concentrations in NHANES. ResultsOverall, significant changes in gene expression varied across doses of each chemical and benchmark dose modeling revealed dose-responsive alterations of thousands of different genes. Comparison of benchmark data to NHANES chemical biomarker concentrations indicated an overlap between actual exposure levels and levels sufficient to cause a gene expression response. Enrichment and cell deconvolution analyses showed benchmark dose responses correlated with changes in cancer and breast cancer related pathways, including induction of basal-like characteristics for some chemicals, including p,p-DDE, lead, copper, and methyl paraben. DiscussionThese analyses revealed that these 21 chemicals induce significant changes in pathways involved in breast cancer initiation and progression at human exposure relevant doses.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Environmental Research
46 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.3%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 17%
10.4%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 16%
6.5%
4
Environment International
42 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.7%
5
Archives of Toxicology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
6
Journal of the Endocrine Society
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
50% of probability mass above
7
Environmental Science & Technology
64 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.2%
8
Cancer Research Communications
46 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.8%
9
Environmental Health Perspectives
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.8%
10
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
11
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
12
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.8%
13
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.4%
14
Chemosphere
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
15
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
14 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.0%
16
Epigenetics
43 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
17
PLOS Water
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
18
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
19
International Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.9%
20
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
21
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
22
Environmental Pollution
35 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
23
Toxicological Sciences
38 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
24
Breast Cancer Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
25
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 24%
0.8%
26
Evolutionary Applications
91 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
27
Scientific Data
174 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
28
Cancer Research
116 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
29
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
30
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%