Back

Particulate matter air pollution and COVID-19 infection, severity, and mortality: A systematic review

Sheppard, N.; Carroll, M.; Gao, C. X.; Lane, T. J.

2022-11-17 epidemiology
10.1101/2022.11.16.22282100 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background and objectiveEcological studies indicate ambient particulate matter [≤]2.5mm (PM2.5) air pollution is associated with poorer COVID-19 outcomes. However, these studies cannot account for individual heterogeneity and often have imprecise estimates of PM2.5 exposure. We review evidence from studies using individual-level data to determine whether PM2.5 increases risk of COVID-19 infection, severe disease, and death. MethodsSystematic review of case-control and cohort studies, searching Medline, Embase, and WHO COVID-19 up to 30 June 2022. Study quality was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Results were pooled with a random effects meta-analysis, with Eggers regression, funnel plots, and leave-one-out and trim-and-fill analyses to adjust for publication bias. ResultsN=18 studies met inclusion criteria. A 10g/m3 increase in PM2.5 exposure was associated with 66% (95% CI: 1.31-2.11) greater odds of COVID-19 infection (N=7) and 127% (95% CI: 1.41-3.66) increase in severe illness (hospitalisation or worse) (N=6). Pooled mortality results (N=5) were positive but non-significant (OR 1.40; 0.94 to 2.10). Most studies were rated "good" quality (14/18 studies), though there were numerous methodological issues; few used individual-level data to adjust for confounders like socioeconomic status (4/18 studies), instead using area-based indicators (12/18 studies) or not adjusting for it (3/18 studies). Most severity (9/10 studies) and mortality studies (5/6 studies) were based on people already diagnosed COVID-19, potentially introducing collider bias. ConclusionThere is strong evidence that ambient PM2.5 increases the risk of COVID-19 infection, and weaker evidence of increases in severe disease and mortality. FundingThis review was completed as a Scholarly Intensive Placement project by NS, which received no funding. Competing interestsThe authors declare no competing interests. RegistrationThis study was registered on PROSPERO on 8 July 2022 (CRD42022345129): https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42022345129

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.