Particulate matter air pollution and COVID-19 infection, severity, and mortality: A systematic review
Sheppard, N.; Carroll, M.; Gao, C. X.; Lane, T. J.
Show abstract
Background and objectiveEcological studies indicate ambient particulate matter [≤]2.5mm (PM2.5) air pollution is associated with poorer COVID-19 outcomes. However, these studies cannot account for individual heterogeneity and often have imprecise estimates of PM2.5 exposure. We review evidence from studies using individual-level data to determine whether PM2.5 increases risk of COVID-19 infection, severe disease, and death. MethodsSystematic review of case-control and cohort studies, searching Medline, Embase, and WHO COVID-19 up to 30 June 2022. Study quality was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Results were pooled with a random effects meta-analysis, with Eggers regression, funnel plots, and leave-one-out and trim-and-fill analyses to adjust for publication bias. ResultsN=18 studies met inclusion criteria. A 10g/m3 increase in PM2.5 exposure was associated with 66% (95% CI: 1.31-2.11) greater odds of COVID-19 infection (N=7) and 127% (95% CI: 1.41-3.66) increase in severe illness (hospitalisation or worse) (N=6). Pooled mortality results (N=5) were positive but non-significant (OR 1.40; 0.94 to 2.10). Most studies were rated "good" quality (14/18 studies), though there were numerous methodological issues; few used individual-level data to adjust for confounders like socioeconomic status (4/18 studies), instead using area-based indicators (12/18 studies) or not adjusting for it (3/18 studies). Most severity (9/10 studies) and mortality studies (5/6 studies) were based on people already diagnosed COVID-19, potentially introducing collider bias. ConclusionThere is strong evidence that ambient PM2.5 increases the risk of COVID-19 infection, and weaker evidence of increases in severe disease and mortality. FundingThis review was completed as a Scholarly Intensive Placement project by NS, which received no funding. Competing interestsThe authors declare no competing interests. RegistrationThis study was registered on PROSPERO on 8 July 2022 (CRD42022345129): https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42022345129
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Long-term effects of a coalmine fire on hospital and ambulance use: an interrupted time series study 96%
- Brick kiln pollution and its impact on health: A systematic review and meta-analysis 95%
- Long-Term Exposure to Fine Particulate Matter, Lung Function and Cognitive Performance: A Prospective Dutch Cohort Study on the Underlying Routes 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Do improved biomass cookstove interventions improve indoor air quality and blood pressure? A systematic review and meta-analysis 95%
- Long-term air pollution and other risk factors associated with COVID-19 at the census-tract-level in Colorado 95%
- Links between air pollution and COVID-19 in England 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Potential Health Benefits of Eliminating Traffic Emissions in Urban Areas 94%
- Association of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in moss with blood biomarker among nearby residents in Portland, Oregon 93%
- Prenatal polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon exposure and birth outcomes in a pregnancy cohort in Nairobi, Kenya. 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Lifetime air pollution exposure from prenatal to 18 years and cardiovascular health in young adulthood: findings from a UK birth cohort 95%
- Long-term exposure to air-pollution and COVID-19 mortality in England: a hierarchical spatial analysis 94%
- In vitro genotoxic and mutagenic potentials of combustion particles from marine fuels with different sulfur contents 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Associations between respiratory health outcomes and coal mine fire PM2.5 smoke exposure: a cross-sectional study 95%
- Short-term acute exposure to wildfire smoke and lung function in a Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) cohort 94%
- Assessing the Impact of Non-exhaust Emissions on the Asthmatic Airway (IONA) Protocol for a randomised three exposure crossover study 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.