A simple model of how heterogeneous disease transmission impacts the emergence of variants and their detection
Taylor, B. P.; Hanage, W. P.
Show abstract
Models of infectious disease transmission have shown the importance of heterogeneous contact networks for epidemiology; the most connected individuals are most likely to be infected early. Yet it is cumbersome to parameterize and incorporate such networks into simple models. We introduce an alternative model framework that explicitly includes attendance at and disease transmission within gatherings of different sizes, which disaggregates sequential epidemics moving from the most to least social subpopulations that underly the overall, single-peaked infection curve. This can systematically bias initial estimates of the growth rate for emerging variants and their severity, if vulnerable populations avoid large gatherings. Finally, we show that how often similarly social individuals preferentially interact (i.e., homophily, or assortative mixing) tunes the magnitude and duration of these biases. Together, we provide a simple framework for incorporating socialization and behavior in epidemic models, which can help contextualize surveillance of emerging infectious agents.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Dynamic mean and variance of microparasite load give key insights into population dynamics and underlying mechanisms 97%
- Role of high-dose exposure in transmission hot zones as a driver of SARS-CoV2 dynamics 96%
- Roles of generation-interval distributions in shaping relative epidemic strength, speed, and control of new SARS-CoV-2 variants 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- The evolutionary cost of homophily: social stratification facilitates stable variant coexistence and increased rates of evolution in host-associated pathogens 97%
- Immune Heterogeneity and Epistasis Explain Punctuated Evolution of SARS-CoV-2 97%
- Winter is coming: pathogen emergence in seasonal environments 96%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.