Protocol of a randomized controlled trial evaluating program facilitating empathetic communication for initiating advanced care planning discussions between patients with advanced cancer and healthcare providers (J-SUPPORT 2104)
Obama, K.; Fujimori, M.; Okamura, M.; Kadowaki, M.; Ueno, T.; Boku, N.; Mori, M.; Akechi, T.; Yamaguchi, T.; Oyamada, S.; Okizaki, A.; Miyaji, T.; Sakurai, N.; Uchitomi, Y.
Show abstract
IntroductionIn patients with incurable advanced cancer, preferences about treatment and how to spend their final days are not adequately discussed. This process of discussion is called "advanced care planning" (ACP), and timely intervention is recommended. As the communication attitude of healthcare providers is a critical factor in ACP facilitation, improving their communication attitudes may reduce patient distress, improve care satisfaction, and reduce unnecessarily aggressive treatment. Digital mobile devices are being developed for behavioral interventions due to their low space and time restrictions, and the ease of sharing information. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of a facilitation program utilizing a mobile app developed to improve communication between cancer patients and healthcare providers regarding ACP. Methods and analysisThis study utilizes a parallel-group, evaluator-blind, randomized controlled trial design. We plan to recruit 264 adult patients with incurable advanced cancer. Intervention group participants will use a mobile app ACP program and undergo a 30-minute interview with a trained intervention provider to discuss with the oncologist at the next patient visit. Control group participants will continue their usual treatment. The primary outcome is the oncologists communication behavior score assessed using audio recordings of the consultation. The secondary outcomes include communication between patients and oncologists and the patients distress, quality of life, care goals and preferences, and medical care utilization. We will use a full analysis set with the registered participant population who received at least a part of the intervention. Ethics and disseminationThe study protocol was reviewed and approved by the Scientific Advisory Board of the Japan Supportive, Palliative and Psychosocial Oncology Group (Registration No. 2104) and the Institutional Review Board of the National Cancer Center Hospital (registration No. 2020-500). The results of the RCT will be published in peer-reviewed scientific journals and presented at scientific meetings. Strengths and limitations of this studyO_LIRandomized controlled trials using mobile apps for behavior change and psychological interventions are increasing, and this study is unique in its focus on facilitating communication about advanced care planning (ACP). C_LIO_LIThe intervention will include mobile apps which can be used in environments the participants find relaxing and engaging. The benefit is particularly significant for patients with advanced cancer who need to express their values and what is crucial to them. C_LIO_LIThere is currently no gold standard for evaluating ACP discussions between patients and healthcare providers. The methods facilitate ACP discussions in various aspects of this study to produce a variety of practical insights. C_LIO_LIThe timing of introducing ACP discussions must be individualized to each patient, and it is anticipated that some participants may find this intervention burdensome. Therefore, more careful ACP referrals are needed, and qualitative exploration of study dropouts is needed. C_LIO_LIMultiple intervention components make it difficult to determine which is most effective. Individualized assessments of app usage, intervention adherence, and patient satisfaction could clarify the challenges and help determine next steps. C_LI
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A Mobile App for Prolonged Grief among Bereaved Parents: Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial 93%
- Palliative care in the treatment of women with breast cancer: a scoping review protocol 93%
- Surgical Resection, Radiotherapy, And Percutaneous Thermal Ablation for Treatment of Stage 1 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- From many voices, one question: Community co-design of a population-based qualitative cancer research study 95%
- Study Protocol: LIAM Mc Trial (Linking In with Advice and supports for Men impacted by Metastatic cancer) 95%
- Evaluating the effectiveness of mindfulness alone compared to exercise and mindfulness on fatigue in women with gynaecology cancer (GEMS): Protocol for a randomised feasibility trial 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Can Large Language Models Aid Caregivers of Pediatric Cancer Patients in Information Seeking? A Cross-Sectional Investigation 95%
- A Video Intervention to Improve Patient Understanding of Tumor Genomic Testing in Patients with Cancer 91%
- Evaluation of Correlation between CD44, Radiotherapy Response and Survival Rate in Patients with Advanced Stage of Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma (HNSCC) 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Improving Patient Engagement in Phase 2 Clinical Trials with a Trial-specific Patient Decision Aid (tPDA): A Development and Usability Study 95%
- Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based Chatbots in Promoting Health Behavioral Changes: A Systematic Review 94%
- Using a Multilingual AI Care Agent to Reduce Disparities in Colorectal Cancer Screening: Higher FIT Test Adoption Among Spanish-Speaking Patients 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Scientific hypothesis generation process in clinical research: a secondary data analytic tool versus experience study protocol 93%
- Ensuring a successful transition from Pap to HPV-based primary screening in Canada: a study protocol to investigate the psychosocial correlates of women’s screening intentions 92%
- Strategies and Tools for electronic health records and physician workflow alignment: A scoping review protocol 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.