Back

Small proteome of the nitrogen-fixing plant symbiont Sinorhizobium meliloti

Hadjeras, L.; Heiniger, B.; Maass, S.; Scheuer, R.; Gelhausen, R.; Azarderakhsh, S.; Barth-Weber, S.; Backofen, R.; Becher, D.; Ahrens, C. H.; Sharma, C. M.; Evguenieva-Hackenberg, E.

2022-11-12 molecular biology
10.1101/2022.11.12.516264 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The soil-dwelling plant symbiont Sinorhizobium meliloti is a major model organism of Alphaproteobacteria. Despite numerous detailed OMICS studies, information about small open reading frame (sORF)-encoded proteins (SEPs) is largely missing, because sORFs are poorly annotated, and SEPs are hard to detect experimentally. However, given that SEPs can fulfill important functions, cataloging the full complement of translated sORFs is critical for analyzing their roles in bacterial physiology. Ribosome profiling (Ribo-seq) can detect translated sORFs with high sensitivity, but is not yet routinely applied to bacteria because it must be adapted for each species. Here, we established a Ribo-seq procedure for S. meliloti 2011 based on RNase I digestion and detected translation for 60% of the annotated coding sequences during growth in minimal medium. Using ORF prediction tools based on Ribo-seq data, subsequent filtering, and manual curation, the translation of 37 non-annotated sORFs with [≤] 70 amino acids was predicted with high confidence. The Ribo-seq data were supplemented by mass spectrometry (MS) analyses from three sample preparation approaches and two integrated proteogenomic search databases (iPtgxDBs). Searches against a standard and a 20-fold smaller Ribo-seq data-informed custom iPtgxDB confirmed many annotated SEPs and identified 11 additional novel SEPs. Epitope tagging and Western blot analysis confirmed the translation of 15 out of 20 SEPs selected from the translatome map. Overall, by applying MS and Ribo-seq as complementary approaches, the small proteome of S. meliloti was substantially expanded by 48 novel SEPs. Several of them are conserved from Rhizobiaceae to Bacteria, suggesting important physiological functions.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
ISME Communications
103 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.9%
2
The ISME Journal
194 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.3%
3
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
8.6%
4
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 26%
6.9%
5
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 3%
6.5%
50% of probability mass above
6
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 4%
4.9%
7
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 25%
2.6%
8
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.1%
9
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
10
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.8%
11
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 61%
1.5%
12
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 48%
1.2%
13
Nature Microbiology
133 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
14
Journal of Proteome Research
215 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
15
Microorganisms
101 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
16
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 64%
0.9%
17
The Plant Cell
141 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
18
The Plant Journal
197 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
19
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
20
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
301 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
21
Plant Communications
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
22
Microbiome
139 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
23
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 20%
0.7%
24
Genome Biology
555 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
25
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 31%
0.7%
26
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 34%
0.7%
27
Molecular Systems Biology
142 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%