Back

Bone Marrow- and Umbilical Cord-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cell Secretome Alters Gene Expression and Upregulates Motility of Human Endometrial Stromal Cells

Zhao, Q.; Larios, K.; Naaldijk, Y.; Sherman, L.; Chemerinski, A.; Okereke, K.; Rameshwar, P.; Lemenze, A.; Douglas, N. C.; Morelli, S. S.

2022-11-14 cell biology
10.1101/2022.11.12.516251 bioRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionCyclic regeneration of the endometrium, and its repair after parturition or injury, are crucial for successful reproduction. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) derived from bone marrow (BM-MSC) and umbilical cord (UC-MSC) facilitate tissue repair via their secretome, which contains growth factors and cytokines that promote wound healing. Despite the implication of MSCs in endometrial regeneration and repair, the mechanisms remain unclear. This study tested the hypothesis that the secretome of MSCs from human BM and UC upregulates human endometrial stromal cell (HESC) proliferation, migration and invasion, and activates pathways to increase HESC motility. MethodsMSCs were purchased from ATCC (BM-MSC-1) and cultured from the BM aspirate of three healthy female donors (BM-MSC-2-4), and from umbilical cords of two healthy male term infants (UC-MSC-1-2). Indirect co-culture of MSCs and hTERT-immortalized HESCs via a transwell system studied the effect of the BM-MSC and UC-MSC secretome on HESC proliferation, migration, and invasion. To study the effect of the MSC secretome on HESC gene expression, HESCs were exposed to the BM-MSC secretome via indirect co-culture for 24 h. Total RNA was extracted from HESCs for RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq). Differentially expressed genes (DEG) and significantly altered pathways were identified. MSigDB was used to identify the top 15 enriched biological pathways (padj < 0.05). RT-qPCR was performed to validate changes in mRNA expression of DEG common to both BM-MSC exposures. Given robust upregulation of CCL2 mRNA expression in HESCs exposed to the BM- and UC-MSC secretomes, transwell migration and invasion assays were performed to determine the effect of recombinant CCL2 on HESC motility. Statistical significance was defined as p<0.05. ResultsIndirect co-culture of HESCs with BM- or UC-MSCs resulted in significant increase in HESC migration and invasion regardless of the source of MSCs. However, effects on cellular proliferation varied among the MSC donors. Exposure of HESCs to the secretome of BM-MSCs changed the expression of 10,139 genes with FDR < 0.05. There was overlap among 4350 genes between HESCs exposed to BM-MSC-1 and BM-MSC-2. Within four biological pathways enriched in HESCs, 4 genes (CCL2, HGF, PLAU, and BDKRB2) were differentially expressed in HESCs that had been cocultured with BM-MSC-1 and BM-MSC-2. qRT-PCR showed significantly increased mRNA expression of CCL2 in HESCs exposed to BM-MSC-1 (5-fold) and BM-MSC-2 (7.7-fold). In contrast, the increase in HGF expression was significant after exposure to BM-MSC-2 (1.8-fold) but not BM-MSC-1. Exposure to the UC-MSC secretome had similar effects on HESC-derived CCL2 and HGF levels. CCL2 expression was significantly increased (6.5-fold) by UC-MSC-2 but not by UC-MSC-1; HGF expression was significantly increased (1.6-fold) by UC-MSC-2 but not by UC-MSC-1. Validation studies indicated that exposure to recombinant CCL2 for 48 hours significantly increased HESC migration (1.2-fold) and invasion (1.4-fold). These data suggest that CCL2 is a key factor in mediating MSC-induced HESC motility. ConclusionIncreased HESC motility by the secretome of BM- and UC-MSC appears to be mediated by paracrine and autocrine mechanisms, in part by upregulated CCL2 expression in HESC. Together, our data support the potential for leveraging the MSC secretome as a novel cell-free therapy in the treatment of disorders of endometrial regeneration.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Stem Cells
31 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.2%
2
Stem Cell Research & Therapy
30 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.2%
3
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 24%
7.0%
4
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 29%
3.6%
5
Journal of Biological Chemistry
690 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.3%
50% of probability mass above
6
Stem Cell Reports
130 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.2%
7
Stem Cell Research
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.9%
8
The FASEB Journal
194 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.7%
9
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
233 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.2%
10
Experimental Cell Research
28 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.2%
11
Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications
84 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.0%
12
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 14%
2.0%
13
Cytotherapy
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
14
American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology
39 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.6%
15
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.5%
16
Cells
249 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
17
Stem Cells Translational Medicine
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.4%
18
Biology Open
156 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
19
Biology of Reproduction
36 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
20
Frontiers in Endocrinology
58 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.2%
21
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 38%
1.0%
22
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 63%
0.9%
23
Cell Communication and Signaling
51 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
24
Human Reproduction
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
25
Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences
96 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
26
Advanced Biology
29 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
27
Cell Proliferation
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.5%
28
Environmental Pollution
37 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%