Back

Neuromodulatory organization in the developing rat somatosensory cortex

Colangelo, C.; Munoz, A.; Antonietti, A.; Anton-Fernandez, A.; Romani, A.; Herttuainen, J.; Markram, H.; DeFelipe, J.; Ramaswamy, S.

2022-11-13 neuroscience
10.1101/2022.11.11.516108 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The vast majority of cortical synapses are found in the neuropil which is implicated in multiple and diverse functions underlying brain computation. Unraveling the organizing principles of the cortical neuropil requires an intricate characterization of synaptic connections established by excitatory and inhibitory axon terminals, of intrinsic and extrinsic origin and from ascending projections that govern the function of cortical microcircuits through the release of neuromodulators either through point-to-point chemical synapses or diffuse volume transmission (VT). Even though neuromodulatory release has been studied for almost a century it is still not clear if one modality prevails upon the other. The hindlimb representation of the somatosensory cortex (HLS1) of two-week old Wistar rats has served as a model system to dissect the microcircuitry of neurons and their synaptic connections. In the present study, we quantified the fiber length per cortical volume and the density of varicosities for cholinergic, catecholaminergic and serotonergic neuromodulatory systems in the cortical neuropil using immunocytochemical staining and stereological techniques. Acquired data were integrated into a novel computational framework to reconcile the specific modalities and predict the effects of neuromodulatory release in shaping neocortical network activity. We predict that acetylcholine (ACh), dopamine (DA), serotonin (5-HT) release desynchronizes cortical activity by inhibiting slow oscillations (delta range), and that 5-HT triggers faster oscillations (theta). Moreover, we found that high levels (>40%) of neuromodulatory VT are sufficient to induce network desynchronization, but also that combining volume release with synaptic inputs leads to more robust and stable effects, meaning that lower levels of VT are needed to achieve the same outcome (10%).

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
eneuro
439 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.5%
2
Frontiers in Neural Circuits
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.5%
3
Frontiers in Neuroscience
256 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.6%
4
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 20%
6.1%
5
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
60 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.7%
6
European Journal of Neuroscience
189 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.3%
7
Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
41 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
50% of probability mass above
8
The Journal of Neuroscience
1025 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.9%
9
The Journal of Physiology
150 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.4%
10
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 10%
3.1%
11
Neuroinformatics
46 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.1%
12
Neuroscience
97 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.7%
13
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 41%
2.6%
14
Journal of Neurophysiology
302 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
15
Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
91 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.3%
16
Cerebral Cortex
396 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.3%
17
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 18%
1.7%
18
Brain Structure and Function
93 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.5%
19
Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.4%
20
Journal of Computational Neuroscience
29 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
21
Frontiers in Physiology
106 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
22
Cell Reports
1498 papers in training set
Top 22%
1.3%
23
Neural Networks
35 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
24
Journal of Neural Engineering
221 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
25
NeuroImage
903 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.0%
26
Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.0%
27
Brain Sciences
55 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
28
Hippocampus
56 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%
29
Network Neuroscience
126 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
30
Current Research in Neurobiology
16 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.6%