Back

CelltypeR: A framework to identify and characterize cell types in human midbrain organoids using flow cytometry

Thomas, R. A.; Sirois, J. M.; Li, S.; Gestin, A.; Piscopo, V. E.; Lepine, P.; Mathur, M.; Chen, C. X. Q.; Soubannier, V.; Goldsmith, T. M.; Fawaz, L.; Durcan, T. M.; Fon, E. A.

2022-11-13 neuroscience
10.1101/2022.11.11.516066 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Motivated by the growing number of single cell RNA sequencing datasets (scRNAseq) revealing the cellular heterogeneity in complex tissues, particularly in brain and induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-derived brain models, we developed a high-throughput, standardized approach for reproducibly characterizing cell types in complex neuronal tissues based on protein expression levels. Our approach combines a flow cytometry (FC) antibody panel targeting brain cells with a computational pipeline called CelltypeR, with functions for aligning and transforming datasets, optimizing unsupervised clustering, annotating and quantifying cell types, and statistical comparisons. We applied this workflow to human iPSC-derived midbrain organoids and identified the expected brain cell types, including neurons, astrocytes, radial glia, and oligodendrocytes. Defining gates based on the expression levels of our protein markers, we performed Fluorescence-Activated Cell Sorting of astrocytes, radial glia, and neurons, cell types were then confirmed by scRNAseq. Among the sorted neurons, we identified three subgroups of dopamine (DA) neurons; one reminiscent of substantia nigra DA neurons, the cell type most vulnerable in Parkinsons disease. Finally, we use our workflow to track cell types across a time course of organoid differentiation. Overall, our adaptable analysis framework provides a generalizable method for reproducibly identifying cell types across FC datasets.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.