The Nature of Race in Germany: A systematic literature review of human classifications in German life sciences
Bartram, I.; Schnieder, L.; Ellebrecht, N.; Ruland, F.; Pluemecke, T.; zur Nieden, A.
Show abstract
The use of human diversity classifications like race, ethnicity, ancestry, or migration background entails a range of scientific as well as social consequences, therefore, a careful application is vital. In this article, we present results from a systematic literature review and subsequent quantitative content analysis based on 546 papers focusing on classifications applied in life sciences studies at German research institutions. Our aim is to capture a snap-shot of current classification practices applied to categorize humans across various disciplines and fields in a specific national context that remains underexposed in this regard. The review substantiates a) the results from earlier studies that point to heterogeneity, inconsistency and vagueness of human classifications used in the life sciences, and b) underlines the presumed specificity of the German science context, where the term "race" is comparatively little used. Our findings stress the need for German researchers to partake in the ongoing international debate on the practice of human classification in the life sciences to advance the international and interdisciplinary transferability of scientific results and, first and foremost, to avoid unintended effects such as overgeneralization, racialization, and stigmatization.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Criteria for Detection of Married or Cohabiting Couples in the UK Biobank 89%
- Association of COVID-19 employment disruption with mental and social wellbeing: evidence from nine UK longitudinal studies 88%
- Racism and health and wellbeing among children and youth - an updated systematic review and meta-analysis 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Transparency in the secondary use of health data: Assessing the status quo of guidance and best practices 91%
- Discrepancy review: A feasibility study of a novel peer review intervention to reduce undisclosed discrepancies between registrations and publications 89%
- The evolution of coordination: A phylogenetic meta-analysis and systematic review 88%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- The neuroprotective effects of estrogen and estrogenic compounds in spinal cord injury 86%
- Effects of exogenous oxytocin on human brain function are regulated by oxytocin gene expression: a meta-analysis of 20 years of oxytocin neuroimaging and transcriptomic analyses 85%
- Structural Brain Correlates of Cognitive Function in Schizophrenia: A Meta-Analysis 85%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.