Back

Grip-preference distribution among Asian-Oceanian floorball players is opposite that of European and North American players - How environmental constraints may influence human motor behaviour

Ekman, K. E.; Pedersen, A. V.

2022-11-13 animal behavior and cognition
10.1101/2022.11.10.515948 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Whilst most humans are right-handed, handedness alone cannot explain the large variability observed in bimanual motor behaviour. Sport-specific motor behaviour provides a natural laboratory for laterality and motor-control research. It is known among floorball players, that Europeans more often play using a left-sided grip, whereas most Asian players are right-gripped, with no logical explanation. However, the exact grip-side distribution is unknown. The present study investigated the influence of environmental constraints on lateral motor behaviour by assessing geographic variabilities in floorball-specific grip preferences between European and Asian national team floorball players. A small-scale Big Data approach was utilised to collect data on lateral preferences for both field players and goalkeepers from the International Floorball Federation website. Data included 2,935 players representing 40 national teams from three different confederations (Europe, Asia-Oceania, and North America). More than two-thirds of European and North American players preferred a left-sided grip, whereas the same number of Asian-Oceanian players preferred a right-sided grip. To the best of our knowledge, these are the first findings of such large geographic variations in any lateralised motor behaviour. No biological factors are likely responsible for the difference in lateral-preference distribution. Environmental and task-specific constraints are discussed as possible explanations. O_TEXTBOXSummary Box Sport-specific laterality is generally believed to be correlated with general handedness. In floorball, the bimanual grip-preference distribution is the exact opposite for European versus Asian-Oceanian national team field players, whilst goalkeepers throwing-hand preference is similar across all confederations and, thus, aligned with general handedness. Lateral preferences in a sport may develop somewhat independently of athletes general handedness, possibly guided by external environmental factors. C_TEXTBOX

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 11%
17.4%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 1%
17.4%
3
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.6%
4
Experimental Physiology
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
5
Human Movement Science
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
6
Frontiers in Sports and Active Living
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.9%
7
Animal Behaviour
65 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.6%
8
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.7%
9
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.3%
10
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
11
Journal of Biomechanics
57 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
12
Biology Open
130 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
13
Experimental Brain Research
46 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
14
Behavioural Processes
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
15
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
16
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 22%
1.2%
17
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
53 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
18
Animals
20 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
19
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
20
Neuropsychologia
77 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
21
Journal of Experimental Biology
249 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
22
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 58%
0.7%
23
Frontiers in Psychology
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
24
Behavioural Brain Research
70 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
25
Ethology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%