WHAT IS THE RISK OF DEVELOPING A SEVERE FORM OF COVID-19 INFECTION AMONG ADULTS WHO CURRENTLY SMOKE COMPARED TO EX-SMOKERS? A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis
Abaate, T. J.; Prince, A. N.
Show abstract
IntroductionSmoking is one of the lifestyle choices associated with an increased risk of chronic health conditions and poorer COVID-19 outcomes. Because it is known that the lungs recover after quitting smoking, a direct comparison of the severity of COVID-19 infection in current and former smokers needs to be investigated. Methods and analysisThe Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocol (PRISMA-P) 2015 Checklist was used. Non-randomized studies will be searched in PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL library, Embase, and Epistemonikos from December 2019 to the present. Hand-searching of grey literature, key journals, and reference lists will be conducted This review will include studies of current and former smokers, with the main outcome being ICU admission, assisted respiration, or death. Two independent reviewers will select primary studies and abstract data from them. The Newcastle-Ottawa checklist will be used to assess the risk of bias, and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) framework will be used to assess the quality of cumulative evidence. RevMan 5.4 will be used for data analysis. The I2 statistic will be used to evaluate heterogeneity. For similar studies, the fixed-effect method of a meta-analysis will be used; otherwise, a random-effect model will be used. The qualitative synthesis will be used for studies that are ineligible for the quantitative approach. Ethical consideration and disseminationBecause published data will be reviewed, no ethical approval is required. Our findings will be presented at national and/or international conferences, and they will be published in a peer-reviewed journal. PROSPERO registration number CRD42022368552 ARTICLE SUMMARY Strengths and limitations of this studyO_LIThis is a focused research question comparing the current and ex-smokers risk of contracting the severe form of COVID-19. C_LIO_LIThis systematic review and meta-analysis will provide evidence of the dangers of smoking during the COVID-19 pandemic. C_LIO_LIThe PRISMA-P reporting guidelines were strictly followed while writing this protocol. C_LIO_LIStudy selection will be carried out by two independent reviewers and a third person will intervene if a disagreement arises. C_LIO_LIA potential limitation is that an observational study design will be used in this systematic review. C_LI
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Personal protective equipment for reducing the risk of COVID-19 infection among healthcare workers involved in emergency trauma surgery during the pandemic: a systematic review protocol 94%
- Safety and feasibility of lung biopsy in diagnosis of acute respiratory distress syndrome: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis 94%
- Surgical Resection, Radiotherapy, And Percutaneous Thermal Ablation for Treatment of Stage 1 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Laboratory-confirmed respiratory viral infection triggers for acute myocardial infarction and stroke: systematic review protocol 95%
- Prevalence and outcomes of co-infection and super-infection with SARS-CoV-2 and other pathogens: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis 95%
- Protocol for the systematic review of the Pneumocystis jirovecii -associated pneumonia in non-HIV immunocompromised patients 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Artificial Intelligence Applications for COVID-19 in Intensive Care and Emergency Settings: A Systematic Review 92%
- Have deaths of despair risen during the COVID-19 pandemic? A rapid systematic review 91%
- Non-pharmacological therapies for post-viral syndromes, including Long COVID: A systematic review 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Use of Powered Air-Purifying Respirator(PAPR) by healthcare workers for preventing highly infectious viral diseases -a systematic review of evidence 92%
- Prevalence of mental health illness in Nigeria: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis 91%
- Quantification of the association between predisposing health conditions, demographic, and behavioural factors with hospitalisation, intensive care unit admission, and death from COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- A comparison of regression discontinuity and propensity score matching to estimate the causal effects of statins using electronic health records 90%
- The methodologies to assess the effects of non-pharmaceutical interventions during COVID-19: a systematic review 89%
- Moving beyond risk ratios in sibling analysis: estimating clinically useful measures from family-based analysis 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.