Back

Managing invasive hybrids through habitat restoration in an endangered salamander system

Cooper, R. D.; Shaffer, B.

2022-11-10 evolutionary biology
10.1101/2022.11.09.515819 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Invasive species present one of the greatest threats to the conservation of biodiversity. When invasives hybridize with endangered native taxa, they introduce novel challenges ranging from the identification of hybrids in the field, to hybrid vigor and the erosion of species identity as genotypes are lost. Across a large swath of central California, a hybrid swarm consisting of admixed endangered California tiger salamanders ("CTS", Ambystoma californiense) and introduced barred tiger salamander (Ambystoma mavortium) has replaced native populations, threatening CTS with genomic extinction. Here we employ a large-scale, genomically-informed field ecological experiment to test whether habitat restoration can reinstate natural selection favoring native salamander genotypes. We constructed 14 large, semi-natural ponds and manipulated their hydroperiods to evaluate larval survival and mass at metamorphosis. Consistent with earlier work, we found overwhelming evidence of hybrid superiority which persisted across all hydroperiod treatments. Short duration ponds substantially reduced the mass and survival probability of both native and hybrid larvae, likely exerting strong selective pressure in the wild. We identified 86 candidate genes, representing 1.8% of 4,723 screened loci, that significantly responded to this hydroperiod-driven selection. In contrast to previous mesocosm-based studies, native CTS never exhibited greater fitness than hybrids, suggesting that hydroperiod management alone will not shift selection to favor native genotypes. However, shortening pond hydroperiod may represent a cost-effective strategy to limit the overall productivity of ponds with non-native genotypes, complimenting additional strategies such as targeted hybrid removal. At a broader level, our experimental approach leverages extensive ecological knowledge, modern genomic tools, and a naturalistic, in situ replicated design to critically evaluate and expand the potential toolkit that managers can use to address this, and other recalcitrant biological invasions. We believe that this strategy may be an important tool for managing the growing number of complex invasion scenarios threatening global biodiversity.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Evolutionary Applications
91 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
37.2%
2
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
14.1%
50% of probability mass above
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 34%
4.3%
4
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.9%
5
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 27%
3.5%
6
Frontiers in Marine Science
55 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.7%
7
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.6%
8
Biological Conservation
43 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.9%
9
Molecular Ecology Resources
161 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.9%
10
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.7%
11
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
12
Biological Invasions
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
13
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.3%
14
Journal of Heredity
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.3%
15
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.2%
16
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 38%
1.2%
17
BMC Ecology and Evolution
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
18
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
19
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
98 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
20
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 73%
0.8%
21
Ecological Applications
28 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
22
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
23
Evolution Letters
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%