Back

Association of diagnosis delay and disease activity with burden on Daily life in 4150 European patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

CORNET, A.; Andersen, J.; Marchiori, F.; Rubio, B.; MERTZ, P.; ARNAUD, L.

2022-11-11 rheumatology
10.1101/2022.11.09.22282123 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveDespite significant improvements in diagnosis delay and treatment strategies, the burden of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) remains high. The objective of the study was to assess the association between diagnosis delay, disease activity and burden on daily life (BoDL) in a large sample of European patients with SLE. MethodsIn May 2020, Lupus Europe, the European umbrella patient association for SLE, conducted a multilingual anonymous online cross-sectional study to individuals with a self-reported physicians diagnosis of SLE living in Europe. The BoDL score was computed using 1 to 5 Likert scales on 5 domains (mobility, anxiety/depression, self-care, daily activities and pain/discomfort) and the sum was rescaled on a 0 (minimum Burden on daily life) to 100 (maximum BoDL) scale. Comparisons between independent groups were made using the Mann-Whitney test for continuous outcomes and the Chi-2 test (or Fishers exact test) for quantitative data. ResultsData of 4,150 SLE patients from 35 European countries were analysed. Those with a diagnosis of SLE within 2 years of first symptoms had significantly lower mean BoDL scores than those diagnosed after 5 years (33.6 versus 44.0, p<0.001). The BoDL score was better in SLE patients feeling that their lupus had been under control during the last 3 months versus the others (34.0% versus 47.6%, p<0.001). ConclusionThis large international study highlights the association between diagnosis delay and self-perceived disease activity with the burden of the disease on the daily life of people living with SLE. Healthcare pathways, which may accelerate diagnosis and optimize therapeutic management, are necessary to improve patients outcomes in SLE.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Rheumatology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
44.8%
2
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
5.2%
50% of probability mass above
3
RMD Open
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.6%
4
Arthritis & Rheumatology
33 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.0%
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 37%
3.9%
6
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
32 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.9%
7
Journal of Internal Medicine
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
8
Clinical Immunology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.1%
9
The Lancet Rheumatology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
10
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.9%
11
Vaccines
196 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
12
Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
13
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
14
Journal of Medical Virology
137 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
15
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.0%
16
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 72%
0.9%
17
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
18
Journal of Personalized Medicine
28 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
19
Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
20
Metabolites
50 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.8%
21
Stem Cell Research & Therapy
30 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
22
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
23
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
24
Biomedicines
66 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%