Back

SIR analytical model applied to 2020 Covid-19 data in Italy

Simeone, R.

2022-11-13 epidemiology
10.1101/2022.11.09.22282122 medRxiv
Show abstract

A simple analytical Susceptible-Infectious-Recovered (SIR) model without vital dynamics is developed from basic assumptions. Based on the data available for the spread of the Covid 19 virus in Italy in 2020, the characteristic parameters of the model are estimated.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
● 5266 papers in training set
Top 12%
15.2%
Similar papers in this journal
2
Scientific Reports
○ 3612 papers in training set
Top 10%
6.8%
Similar papers in this journal
3
Infectious Disease Modelling
○ 54 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.8%
Similar papers in this journal
4
Journal of Theoretical Biology
○ 162 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
5.5%
Similar papers in this journal
5
Chaos, Solitons & Fractals
○ 32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
Similar papers in this journal
6
The European Physical Journal Plus
○ 13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
7
Nonlinear Dynamics
○ 10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.1%
8
Mathematical Biosciences
○ 49 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.1%
50% of probability mass above
9
Epidemiology and Infection
◐ 89 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.4%
10
Royal Society Open Science
● 214 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.2%
11
Frontiers in Applied Mathematics and Statistics
○ 11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
12
Physical Biology
○ 46 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.8%
13
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
○ 92 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.9%
14
Journal of Mathematical Biology
○ 40 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
15
Physical Review E
● 112 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.1%
16
Frontiers in Physics
○ 21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
17
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
○ 20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
18
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
● 235 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
19
Mathematics
○ 11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.1%
20
Mathematical Medicine and Biology: A Journal of the IMA
◐ 10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.1%
21
Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering
● 23 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
22
Cureus
○ 68 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
23
PLOS Computational Biology
● 1863 papers in training set
Top 18%
1.0%
24
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology
○ 29 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
25
Biology
○ 45 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
26
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
○ 128 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
27
F1000Research
○ 88 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
28
Viruses
○ 332 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
29
Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering
○ 10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
30
Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science
● 17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.