Individual differences in volitional social motivation in male and female mice following social stress.
Navarrete, J.; Schneider, K. N.; Smith, B. M.; Goodwin, N. L.; Zhang, Y. Y.; Gross, E.; Tsai, V. S.; Heshmati, M.; Golden, S. A.
Show abstract
BackgroundA key challenge in developing new treatments for neuropsychiatric illness is the disconnect between preclinical models and the complexity of human social behavior. We aimed to integrate voluntary social self-administration into a preclinical rodent stress model, as a platform for the identification of basic brain and behavior mechanisms underlying stress-induced individual differences in social motivation. Here, we introduce an operant social stress (OSS) procedure with male and female mice, where lever presses are reinforced by freely moving social interaction with a familiar social partner across social stress exposure. MethodsOSS is composed of three phases: (i) social self-administration training, (ii) social stress concurrent with daily reinforced social self-administration testing, and (iii) post-stress operant social reward testing under both non-reinforced and reinforced conditions. We resolve social stress-induced changes to social motivation behaviors using hierarchical clustering and aggregated z-scores, capturing the spectrum of individual differences that we describe with a social index score. ResultsOSS captures a range of stress-related dynamic social motivation behaviors inclusive of sex as a biological variable. Both male and female mice lever press for access to a social partner, independent of social partner coat color or familiarity. Social stress attenuates social self-administration in males and promotes social reward seeking behavior in females. Hierarchical clustering does not adequately describe the relative distributions of social motivation following stress, which we find is better described as a non-binary behavioral distribution that we define by introducing the social index score. This index is stable across individual mice. ConclusionWe demonstrate that OSS can be used to detect stable individual differences in stress-induced changes to social motivation in male and female mice. These differences may reflect unique neurobiological, cellular and circuit mechanisms not captured by preclinical models that omit voluntary social behaviors. The inclusion of volitional social procedures may enhance the understanding of behavioral adaptations promoting stress resiliency and their mechanisms under more naturalistic conditions.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Social isolation stress in adolescence, but not adulthood, produces hypersocial behavior in adult male and female C57BL/6J mice 95%
- Multi-domain touchscreen-based cognitive assessment of C57BL/6J female mice shows whole body exposure to 56Fe particle space radiation in maturity improves discrimination learning yet impairs stimulus-response habit learning 95%
- Chronic Physical and Vicarious Psychosocial Stress Alter Fentanyl Consumption and Nucleus Accumbens Rho GTPases in Male and Female C57BL/6 Mice 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Acute stress enhances associative learning via dopamine signaling in the ventral lateral striatum 95%
- Reactivation of early-life stress-sensitive neuronal ensembles contributes to lifelong stress hypersensitivity 94%
- Insular cortex projections to nucleus accumbens core mediate social approach to stressed juvenile rats 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Early life stress alters transcriptomic patterning across reward circuitry in male and female mice 96%
- Distinct ventral tegmental area neuronal ensembles are indispensable for reward-driven approach and stress-driven avoidance behaviors 95%
- SWI/SNF chromatin remodeler complex within the reward pathway is required for behavioral adaptations to stress 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.