Back

Description, Development and Dissemination of Two Consistent Marker-based and Markerless Multibody Models

Lahkar, B. K.; Chaumeil, A.; Dumas, R.; Muller, A.; Robert, T.

2022-11-09 bioengineering
10.1101/2022.11.08.515577 bioRxiv
Show abstract

In human movement analysis, multibody models are an indispensable part of the process both for marker-based and video-based markerless approaches. Constituents (segments, joint constraints, body segment inertial parameters etc.) of such models and modelers choice play an important role in the accuracy of estimated results (segmental and joint kinematics, segmental and whole-body center of mass positions etc.). For marker-based method, although standard models exist, particularly for the lower extremity (e.g., Conventional Gait Model or models embedded in OpenSim), there seems to be a lack of consolidated explanation on the constituents of the whole-body model. For the markerless approach, multibody kinematic models (e.g., the Theia3D model) have been in use lately. However, there is no clear explanation on the estimated quantities (e.g., joint centers, body surface landmarks etc.) and their relation to the underlying anatomy. This also motivates the need for a description of the markerless multibody model. Moreover, comparing markerless results to those of classical marker-based method is currently the most commonly used approach for evaluation of markerless approaches. This study first aims to develop and describe a whole-body marker-based model ready to be used for human movement analysis. Second, the markerless multibody model embedded in Theia3D is described and inertial parameters are redefined. We also report assessment of the markerless approach compared to marker-based method for a static T-pose performed by 15 subjects. Finally, we disseminate the marker-based and markerless multibody models for their use in Visual3D.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 7%
21.8%
2
Sensors
39 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.9%
3
IEEE Access
31 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.9%
4
Journal of Biomechanics
57 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.6%
50% of probability mass above
5
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
28 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.1%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 25%
4.7%
7
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
38 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.7%
8
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.8%
9
IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
40 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.5%
10
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.3%
11
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
12
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
13
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
14
Gait & Posture
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
15
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 19%
1.3%
16
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
17
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.8%
18
Bioengineering
24 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
19
International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
20
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
21
Human Movement Science
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%