Identification Of Multi-Omic Biomarkers From Fecal DNA For Improved Detection Of Colorectal Cancer And Precancerous Lesions
Fang, Y.; Peng, J.; Li, Z.; Jiang, R.; Lin, Y.; Shi, Y.; Sun, J.; Zhuo, D.; Ou, Q.; Chen, J.; Wang, X.; Cai, J.; Zhu, S.; Wan, D.; Wang, Y.; Lu, Z.
Show abstract
BackgroundTimely diagnosis and intervention of colorectal cancer (CRC) at curable stages is essential for improving patient survival. Stool samples carry exfoliation of intestinal epithelium, therefore providing excellent opportunity for non-invasive diagnosis of CRC as well as precancerous lesions. In this study, we aimed to conduct multi-dimensional analysis of fecal DNA and investigate the utility of different types of biomarkers for CRC detection. MethodIn this case-control study, we performed comprehensive analyses of the genomic, epigenomic, and metagenomic features of fecal DNA from CRC patients, individuals with advanced precancerous lesions (APLs) and controls. DNA methylation markers were identified by whole genome bisulfite sequencing of paired colorectal cancer and normal tissues. A multi-gene fecal DNA methylation test was then developed based on three marker genes (SDC2, ADHFE1 and PPP2R5C) using quantitative methylation-specific PCR (qMSP), and validated on fecal DNA samples. Genomic mutation profiles as well as microbiome signatures of fecal DNA were analyzed using high-throughput sequencing. ResultsThe methylation-based fecal DNA test demonstrated an overall sensitivity of 88% for CRC and 46.2% for APL respectively, and a specificity of 91.8% for controls. On the other hand, the mutation-based diagnostic model yielded limited sensitivity, and combined detection of methylation markers and mutation in fecal DNA did not improve the assay performance. Meanwhile, a diagnostic model based on the relative abundance of bacterial species showed inferior performance than the methylation-based model. Finally, integrated diagnostic model combining both methylation and microbial markers showed an enhanced performance (AUC= 0.95) compared to methylation markers alone. ConclusionsThe multi-gene fecal DNA methylation test provided remarkable diagnostic performance for CRCs and APLs. Furthermore, multi-target assay integrating both methylation and microbial markers may further improve the diagnostic performance. Our findings may aid in the development of novel diagnostic tools for CRC.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Bioinformatic Screen with Clinical Validation for the Identification of Novel Stool Based mRNA Biomarkers for the Detection of Colorectal Lesions Including Advanced Precancerous Lesions 95%
- Early screening of colorectal cancer using feature engineering with artificial intelligence-enhanced analysis of nanoscale chromatin modifications 94%
- On the robustness of inference of association with the gut microbiota in stool, swab and mucosal tissue samples 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- A new colorectal cancer risk prediction model incorporating family history, personal and environmental factors 92%
- The Gastric Cancer Registry: A Genomic Translational Resource for Multidisciplinary Research in Stomach Malignancies 91%
- Serum Lipidome Profiling Reveals a Distinct Signature of Ovarian Cancer in Korean Women 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Molecular portraits of colorectal cancer morphological regions 92%
- Comprehensive characterization of tumor microenvironment in colorectal cancer via histopathology-molecular analysis 92%
- A hepatocyte-specific transcriptional program driven by Rela and Stat3 exacerbates experimental colitis in mice by modulating bile synthesis 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Combination of hotspot mutations with methylation and fragmentomic profiles to enhance Multi-Cancer Early Detection 93%
- Impact of Screening and Follow-up Colonoscopy Adenoma Sensitivity on Colorectal Cancer Screening Outcomes in the CRC-AIM Microsimulation Model 91%
- Associations of the 2018 World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute of Cancer Research (WCRF/AICR) Cancer Prevention Recommendations with Stages of Colorectal Carcinogenesis 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.