Back

Identification of functional immune and neuronal tumor cells in glioma

Curry, R. N.; McDonald, M. F.; Ma, Q.; Meyer, J.; Aiba, I.; Lozzi, B.; Cervantes, A.; Ko, Y.; Luna-Figueroa, E.; Choi, D.-J.; Lee, Z.-F.; Jing, J.; Harmanci, A. O.; Rosenbaum, A.; He, P.; Mohila, C.; Jalali, A.; Noebels, J.; Jiang, X.; Deneen, B.; Rao, G.; Serin Harmanci, A.

2022-12-14 cancer biology
10.1101/2022.11.05.515316 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Despite advances in molecular profiling, therapeutic development has been hindered by the inability to identify and target tumour-specific mechanisms without consequence to healthy tissue. Correspondingly, a computational framework capable of accurately distinguishing tumour from non-tumour cells has yet to be developed and cell annotation algorithms are unable to assign integrated genomic and transcriptional profiles to single cells on a cell-by-cell basis. To address these barriers, we developed the Single Cell Rule Association Mining (SCRAM) tool that integrates RNA-inferred genomic alterations with co-occurring cell type signatures for individual cells. Applying SCRAM to glioma, we identified tumour cell trajectories recapitulate temporally-restricted developmental paradigms and feature unique co-occurring identities. Specifically, we validated two previously unreported tumour cell populations with immune and neuronal signatures as hallmarks of human glioma subtypes. In vivo modeling revealed a rare immune-like tumour cell population resembling antigen presenting cells can direct CD8+ T cell responses. In parallel, Patch sequencing studies in human tumours confirmed that neuronal-like glioma cells fire action potentials and represent 40% of IDH1 mutant tumor cells. These studies identified new glioma cell types with functional properties similar to their non-tumour analogues and demonstrate the ability of SCRAM to identify these cell types in unprecedented detail.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.