Back

Nav1.7 and Nav1.8 form supramolecular active clusters with TRKB in mouse and human DRG neurons during development of neuropathic pain

Sun, L.; Xian, H.; Shi, Y.; Yang, T.; Shuai, H.; Xia, R.; Wen, T.; Xia, W.; Qian, R.; Zhu, F.; Liu, Y.; Tian, Z.; Li, L.; Cong, R.; Luo, C.; Wu, S.; Shen, X.; Yu, X.; Xie, R.-G.; Peng, C.

2022-11-11 pain medicine
10.1101/2022.11.05.22281929 medRxiv
Show abstract

Neuropathic pain affects 7-10% of the global population, and one of its characteristics is sensitization of somatosensory nervous system. Altered expression of ion channels and receptors has been found to be involved in neuronal hyperexcitability after injury to somatosensory nervous system, it is, however, unknown that if ion channels and receptors could gain qualitative changes on the level of structure organization when they are excessively expressed in same one neuron during the development of neuropathic pain. Here we show first that not only the expression of voltage-gated sodium channels Nav1.7 (SCN9A), Nav1.8 (SCN10A) and TRKB (also named NTRK2) increased in DRG neurons of patients with over 3-month severe neuropathic pain induced by brachial plexus avulsion (BPA), but also Nav1.7 and Nav1.8 formed supramolecular active clusters with or without TRKB in DRG neurons of mice with chronic neuropathic pain induced by spared nerve injury or diabetic neuropathy and of BPA pain patients with neuropathic pain. Nav1.7, Nav1.8 and TRKB might function in a coordinated manner in orderly organized supramolecular active clusters to geometrically increase the hyperexcitability of pathological DRG neurons. Our findings suggest that supramolecular active clusters of Nav1.7, Nav1.8 and TRKB might need be targeted for curing neuropathic pain, and that inhibition of both Nav1.7 and Nav1.8 might be required to achieve efficient relief of neuropathic pain.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.