Back

High-dimensional immune profiling of dimethyl fumarate and ocrelizumab in multiple sclerosis

Zhang, Y.; Lee, B.; Xie, H.; Rockoff, J.; Satyanarayan, S.; Brandstadter, R.; Kim-Schulze, S.; Ntranos, A.; Lublin, F.

2022-11-10 neurology
10.1101/2022.11.05.22281806 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundDimethyl fumarate (DMF) and ocrelizumab are two effective immunomodulators for multiple sclerosis (MS) with distinct mechanisms of action. Identifying overlapping therapeutic effects between both agents may elucidate common pathways in preventing disease activity. ObjectivesIn this study we analyzed cytokine and immune-profiling data to evaluate the similarities and differences between the two disease-modifying therapies for MS. Methods: Plasma and PBMCs from MS patients were collected at baseline, 3 months and 6 months after treatment with DMF (n=16) and ocrelizumab (n=13). Immunophenotyping was performed with mass cytometry (CyTOF) and analyzed with gating based on cell surface markers. Cytokine analysis from plasma was performed with Olink assays and analyzed with linear mixed effects models. ResultsDMF reduced both effector T and memory B cell populations while increasing CD56bright natural killer (NK) cells. Ocrelizumab exerted its main immunomodulatory effect by reducing the frequency of all B cells and increasing frequency of NK cells. At 6 months, naive B-cells began to reconstitute; however, memory B cells remain depleted. DMF treatment was associated with a significant reduction of plasma cytokines involved in inflammatory pathways, such as IL-6, IL-12, and Dectin-1 signaling. In addition, DMF lowered plasma cytokines that are dysregulated in psoriasis and involved in allograft rejection pathways. Ocrelizumab treatment led to the upregulation of neurotropic proteins in the plasma of MS patients, including proteins involved in NAD+ biosynthesis and tryptophan catabolism. ConclusionOur high-dimensional immunophenotyping results suggest that to exert their effects on MS patients, DMF and ocrelizumab both increase NK cells in addition to affecting different immune cell populations and cytokine pathways. Detecting similarities between the mechanisms of the two drugs may contribute to identifying more specific therapeutic targets.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Neurology Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.4%
2
Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.9%
3
Multiple Sclerosis Journal
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.7%
4
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
34 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.8%
5
Annals of Neurology
64 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.8%
50% of probability mass above
6
Frontiers in Neurology
102 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
5.5%
7
Frontiers in Immunology
638 papers in training set
Top 3%
4.3%
8
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
30 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
9
Neurology
50 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.8%
10
Clinical Immunology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
11
Clinical and Experimental Immunology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
12
Journal of the Neurological Sciences
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
13
Journal of Neurology
28 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
14
eBioMedicine
183 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
15
Brain
168 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
16
Neurobiology of Disease
148 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
17
European Journal of Neurology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
18
Journal of Advanced Research
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
19
Journal of Translational Medicine
57 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
20
BMC Neurology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
21
Movement Disorders
71 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
22
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.6%
23
BMC Medicine
176 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
24
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 65%
0.6%
25
Journal of Neuroinflammation
61 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%