Back

Identification of Multiple Iron Uptake Mechanisms in Enterococcus faecalis and Their Relationship to Virulence

Lemos, J. A.; Brunson, D. N.; Lam, L. N.; Colomer-Winter, C.

2022-11-05 microbiology
10.1101/2022.11.04.515265 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Among the unfavorable conditions bacteria encounter within the host is restricted access to essential trace metals such as iron. To overcome iron deficiency, bacteria deploy multiple strategies to scavenge iron from host tissues with abundant examples of iron acquisition systems being implicated in bacterial pathogenesis. Yet, the mechanisms utilized by the major nosocomial pathogen Enterococcus faecalis to maintain intracellular iron balance are poorly understood. In this report, we conducted a systematic investigation to identify and characterize the iron acquisition mechanisms of E. faecalis and to determine their contribution to virulence. Bioinformatic analysis and literature surveys revealed that E. faecalis possesses three conserved iron uptake systems. Through transcriptomics, we discovered two novel ABC-type transporters that mediate iron uptake. While inactivation of a single transporter had minimal impact on the ability of E. faecalis to maintain iron homeostasis, inactivation of all five systems ({Delta}5Fe strain) disrupted intracellular iron homeostasis and considerably impaired cell growth under iron-deficiency. Virulence of the {Delta}5Fe strain was generally impaired in different animal models but showed niche-specific variations in mouse models, leading us to suspect that heme can serve as an iron source to E. faecalis during mammalian infections. Indeed, heme supplementation restored growth of {Delta}5Fe under iron-depletion and virulence in an invertebrate infection model. Collectively, this study reveals that the collective contribution of five iron transporters promotes E. faecalis virulence and that the ability to acquire and utilize heme as an iron source is critical to the systemic dissemination of E. faecalis.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.