Circulating Tumor DNA (ctDNA) As A Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Assessment And Recurrence Risk In Patients Undergoing Curative Intent Resection With Or Without Adjuvant Chemotherapy In Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review And Meta-analysis
Chidharla, A.; Rapoport, E.; Agarwal, K.; Madala, S.; Linares, B.; Sun, W.; Chakrabarti, S.; Kasi, A.
Show abstract
PURPOSEEmerging data have suggested that circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) can be a reliable biomarker for Minimal residual disease (MRD) in CRC patients. Recent studies have shown that the ability to detect MRD using ctDNA assay after curative-intent surgery will change how to assess recurrence risk and patient selection for adjuvant chemotherapy. METHODSWe performed a meta-analysis of post-operative ctDNA in Stage I-IV (oligometastatic) CRC patients after curative-intent resection. We included 23 studies representing 3,568 patients with evaluable ctDNA in CRC patients post-curative intent surgery. Data were extracted from each study to perform a meta-analysis using RevMan 5.4. software. Subsequent subgroup analysis was performed for stages I-III and oligometastatic stage IV CRC patients. RESULTSThe pooled hazard ratio (HR) for recurrence-free survival (RFS) in post-surgical ctDNA positive versus negative patients in all stages was 7.27 (95% CI 5.49-9.62) p <0.00001. Subgroup analysis revealed pooled HR of 8.14 (95% CI 5.60-11.82) and 4.83 (95% CI 3.64-6.39) for stage I-III and IV CRC, respectively. The pooled HR for RFS in post-adjuvant chemotherapy ctDNA positive versus negative patients in all stages was 10.59 (95% CI 5.59-20.06) p <0.00001. The subgroup analysis based on the ctDNA method showed a pooled HR of 8.66 (95% CI 6.38-11.75) and 3.76 (95% CI 2.58-5.48) for tumor-informed and tumor-agnostic, respectively. CONCLUSIONOur analysis emphasizes that post-operative ctDNA is a strong prognostic marker of RFS. Based on our results, ctDNA can be a significant and independent predictor of RFS. This real-time assessment of treatment benefits using ctDNA can be used as a surrogate endpoint for the development of novel drugs in the adjuvant setting.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Molecular subtyping improves prognostication of Stage 2 colorectal cancer 95%
- ALLIANCE A022104/NRG-GI010: The Janus Rectal Cancer Trial: a randomized phase II/III trial testing the efficacy of triplet versus doublet chemotherapy regarding clinical complete response and disease-free survival in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer 94%
- Study Protocol of A Phase II Study to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of Neo-adjuvant Pembrolizumab and Radiotherapy in Localized Rectal Cancer 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Added-value of whole exome and RNA Sequencing in advanced and refractory cancer patients with no molecular-based treatment recommendation based on a 90-gene panel 92%
- COVID-19 Outcomes in Patients with Cancer: Findings from the University of California Health System Database 92%
- Circulating serum miRNAs predict response to platinum chemotherapy in high-grade serous ovarian cancer 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cell-Free Tumor DNA Dominant Clone Allele Frequency (DCAF) Is Associated With Poor Outcomes In Advanced Biliary Cancers Treated With Platinum-Based Chemotherapy 93%
- Clinical activity of MAPK targeted therapies in patients with non-V600 BRAF mutant tumors 93%
- Clinical activity of Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase (MAPK) inhibitors in patients with MAP2K1 (MEK1)-mutated metastatic cancers 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Molecular pathways in post-colonoscopy versus detected colorectal cancers: results from a nested case-control study 94%
- Frequent post-treatment monitoring of colorectal cancer using individualized ctDNA validated by multi-regional molecular profiling 92%
- Spatial, Temporal, and Molecular Heterogeneity of ADC targets in High-Grade Serous Ovarian Carcinoma 91%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.