MorphoAST: A Machine Learning Workflow for Sub-Doubling Time Single Cell Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing
Tjandra, K. C.; Ram-Mohan, N. C.; Roshardt, M.; Qu, Z.; Zudock, E. J.; Mach, K. E.; Erminaga, O.; Liao, J. C.; Yang, S.; Wong, P. K.
Show abstract
Multidrug-resistant Enterobacteriaceae are among the most urgent global public health threats associated with various life-threatening infections. In the absence of a rapid method to identify antimicrobial susceptibility, empirical use of broad-spectrum antimicrobials such as carbapenem monotherapy has led to the spread of resistant organisms. Rapid determination of antimicrobial resistance is urgently needed to overcome this issue. By capturing dynamic single-cell morphological features of over thirty-nine thousand cells from nineteen strains of Klebsiella pneumoniae, we evaluated strategies based on time and concentration differentials for classifying its susceptibility to a commonly used carbapenem, meropenem, and predicting their minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC). We report morphometric antimicrobial susceptibility testing (MorphoAST), an image-based machine learning workflow, for rapid determination of antimicrobial susceptibility by single-cell morphological analysis within sub-doubling time. We demonstrated that our algorithm has the ability to predict MIC/antimicrobial susceptibility in a fraction of the bacterial doubling time (<50 min.). The classifiers achieved as high as 97% accuracy in 20 minutes (two-fifths of the doubling time) and reached over 99% accuracy within 50 minutes (one doubling time) in predicting the antimicrobial response. A regression model based on the concentration differential of individual cells from nineteen strains predicted the MIC with 100% categorical agreement and essential agreement for seven unseen strains, including two clinical samples from patients with urinary tract infections with different responsiveness to meropenem. The expansion of this innovation to other drug-bug combinations could have significant implications for future development of rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The selection of antibiotic- and bacteriophage-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa is prevented by their combination 94%
- Real-Time Flow Cytometry to assess qualitative and quantitative responses of oral pathobionts during exposure to antiseptics 94%
- Novel Anti-virulence Compounds Disrupt Exotoxin Expression in MRSA 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Tre-DST: A new drug susceptibility test for Mycobacterium tuberculosis using solvatochromic trehalose probes 94%
- An engineered prodrug selectively suppresses β-lactam resistant bacteria in a mixed microbial setting 94%
- Rapid Detection of Carbapenemase-Producing Organisms Using a Luminescent Biosensor 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Antibiotic transport kinetics in Gram-negative bacteria revealed via single-cell uptake analysis and mathematical modelling 93%
- You will know by its tail: a method for quantification of heterogeneity of bacterial populations using single cell MIC profiling 93%
- CombiCTx: Screening diffusion gradients of anti-cancer drug combinations 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Metabolic Preference Assay for Rapid Diagnosis of Bloodstream Infections 93%
- Convergence of resistance and evolutionary responses in Escherichia coli and Salmonella enterica co-inhabiting chicken farms in China 92%
- An anti-virulence drug targeting the evolvability protein Mfd protects against infections with antimicrobial resistant ESKAPE pathogens 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Clinical Pilot of Bacterial Transcriptional Profiling as a Combined Genotypic and Phenotypic Antimicrobial Susceptibility Test 95%
- Clinical Metagenomic Sequencing for Species Identification and Antimicrobial Resistance Prediction in Orthopaedic Device Infection 92%
- A multicenter evaluation of a novel microfluidic rapid AST assay for Gram-negative bloodstream infections 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.