Back

Path Analysis of intra-metastatic hypoxia in breast cancer

Rey-Keim, S.; Schito, L.

2022-11-04 cancer biology
10.1101/2022.11.03.515032 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Hypoxia (low O2) signals into the nucleus of cancer cells through hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF)-1-dependent transcription triggering proliferative, metabolic and vascular adaptations linked to therapy resistance and mortality due to overt metastasis. In contrast with the wealth of molecular data on primary intra-tumoral hypoxia, there is a dearth of statistical modelling studies addressing the mechanisms of intra-metastatic hypoxia. In this study, we used path analysis to model intra-metastatic hypoxia (Hx), HIF-1 expression and microvascular area (MVA) as functions of metastatic cross-sectional area (MCSA) in an advanced mouse breast cancer model; in this context, we tested the effect of conventional, maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) or low-dose metronomic (LDM) chemotherapy. Iterative analysis of 34 non-isomorphic paths yielded four well-fitting, configuration-invariant models [{chi}2(6,171) [≥] 6.12; P [≥] 0.328; CFI [≥] 0.998; RMSEA [≤] 0.07]. All four models contained HIF-1 as a mediating variable within the MCSA{leftrightarrow}Hx{leftrightarrow}MVA path, as well as significant Hx{leftrightarrow}MVA interactions. LDM disrupted the HIF-1{leftrightarrow}MCSA[->]Hx and HIF-1{leftrightarrow}MVA paths; furthermore, all LDM and MTD combinations impaired Hx{leftrightarrow}HIF-1. These results confirmed well-established hypoxic interactions, whilst uncovering possible differential effects of chemotherapeutic modalities upon metastatic size, hypoxia, HIF-1 and vascularisation. Our data indicate that MVA can act as a downstream readout, rather than an adaptive angiogenic mechanism alleviating intra-metastatic hypoxia. Moreover, well-fitting path models locate HIF-1 activity either upstream or downstream of hypoxia, thereby allowing us to posit the existence of bi-directional feedback loops driving vascularisation and growth in metastatic tumours, of relevance for targeted therapies.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.